Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390784›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2025

Definition and recommendations of advance care planning: A Delphi study in five Asian sectors.

Masanori Mori, Helen Y L Chan, Cheng-Pei Lin, Sun-Hyun Kim, Raymond Ng Han Lip, Diah Martina, Kwok Keung Yuen, Shao-Yi Cheng, Sayaka Takenouchi, Sang-Yeon Suh and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advanced cancer patients' knowledge and opinions regarding the French law on advance directives: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Advance Directives in Geriatrics: Proposed Management Algorithm].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Masanori MoriDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-9395
Helen Y L ChanThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-4038-4654
Cheng-Pei LinInstitute of Community Health Care, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5810-8776
Sun-Hyun KimDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, International St Mary's Hospital, Incheon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea.
Raymond Ng Han LipPalliative and Supportive Care, Woodlands Health, Singapore.
Diah MartinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kwok Keung YuenDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Shao-Yi ChengDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2224-4140
Sayaka TakenouchiDepartment of Nursing Ethics, Division of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Sang-Yeon SuhDepartment of Family Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sumytra MenonCentre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9129-4072
Jungyoung KimSafety and Health Department, Catholic Kwandong University, International St Mary's Hospital, Incheon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea.
Ping-Jen ChenDepartment of Family Medicine and Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital and School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7636-0801
Futoshi IwataFaculty of Law, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shimon TashiroDepartment of Sociology, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Oi Ling Annie KwokDepartment of Medicine and Geriatrics, Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong.
Jen-Kuei PengDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsien-Liang HuangDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-5596
Tatsuya MoritaDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Ida J KorfageDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6538-9115
Judith A C RietjensDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0538-5603
Yoshiyuki KizawaDepartment of Palliative and Supportive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Confucian-influenced Asian societies, explicit end-of-life conversations are uncommon and family involvement in decision-making is crucial, which complicates the adoption of culturally sensitive advance care planning.

aimTo develop a consensus definition of advance care planning and provide recommendations for patient-centered and family-based initiatives in Asia.

designA five-round Delphi study was performed. The rating of a definition and 84 recommendations developed based on systematic reviews was performed by experts with clinical or research expertise using a 7-point Likert scale. A median = 1 and an inter-quartile range = 0-1 were considered very strong agreement and very strong consensus, respectively. SETTING/

participantsThe Delphi study was carried out by multidisciplinary experts on advance care planning in five Asian sectors (Hong Kong/Japan/Korea/Singapore/Taiwan).

resultsSeventy-seven of 115 (67%) experts rated the statements. Advance care planning is defined as "a process that enables individuals to identify their values, to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care, to discuss these values, goals, and preferences with family and/or other closely related persons, and health-care providers, and to record and review these preferences if appropriate." Recommendations in the domains of considerations for a person-centered and family-based approach, as well as elements, roles and tasks, timing for initiative, policy and regulation, and evaluations received high levels of agreement and consensus.

conclusionsOur definition and recommendations can guide practice, education, research, and policy-making in advance care planning for Asian populations. Our findings will aid future research in crafting culturally sensitive advance care planning interventions, ensuring Asians receive value-aligned care.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDelphi TechniqueAdultAsiaConsensusDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTerminal CareAdvance care planningAsiadefinitionDelphirecommendations

Identifiers

PMID39390784
PMCPMC11673296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.