Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390752›Full record

ArticleEquine veterinary journal2025

Computed tomography of the equine caudal spine and pelvis: Technique, image quality and anatomical variation in 56 clinical cases (2018-2023).

Nadine Kristina Elise Ogden, Katja Winderickx, Alison Bennell, John David Stack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Equine veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadine Kristina Elise OgdenB&W Equine Hospital, Berkeley, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8272-631X
Katja WinderickxLingehoeve Diergeneeskunde, Lienden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9121-5649
Alison BennellLeahurst Equine Hospital, University of Liverpool, Wirral, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1693-1454
John David StackLeahurst Equine Hospital, University of Liverpool, Wirral, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0064-7923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCross-sectional imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of complex anatomical regions. Computed tomography (CT) of the pelvis and caudal spine in a large group of live horses and ponies has not been previously reported.

objectiveTo describe the procedure for acquiring CT images of horses' caudal spine/pelvis under general anaesthesia (GA) and to detail the image quality, artefacts and anatomical variations in this region. STUDY

designRetrospective case series.

methodsHorses with CT of the caudal spine/pelvis were included. Horses under 6 months and CT examination performed post-mortem were excluded. Protocols, image quality, region of interest, anatomical features and morbidities were analysed.

resultsFifty-six horses (8 months to 20 years, 85-680 kg) met the inclusion criteria. GA ranged from 10 to 60 min (mean: 30, median: 32). There were no adverse events recorded in any of the horses associated with the procedure. Images of all horses were considered of diagnostic quality. Anatomical variations were common and included the location of diverging (widest) interspinous space, the presence of spina bifida in the lumbar and sacral spine, the shape of the last lumbar vertebra and the location of intertransverse joints in terms of where they were present and the degree of fusion/modelling. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Not all horses underwent CT examination of the same regions, the upper size limit of horses is unknown and will vary depending on bore size and table infrastructure. Image noise, particularly in large horses and beam hardening artefacts from hardware and pelvis degraded image quality. Images were of insufficient quality in large horses for soft tissue interpretation.

conclusionCT of the caudal spine and pelvis in live horses with wide-bore CT machines and modified patient infrastructure was safe and produced diagnostic images.

Indexed as

PelvisSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsFemaleHorsesMaleRetrospective StudiesCThorselumbosacralpelvissacroiliac

Identifiers

PMID39390752
PMCPMC12326906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.