Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390745›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

High-fidelity predictions of diffusion in the brain microenvironment.

Nels Schimek, Thomas R Wood, David A C Beck, Michael McKenna, Ali Toghani, Elizabeth Nance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nels SchimekDepartment of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Thomas R WoodDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
David A C BeckDeparment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Michael McKennaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ali ToghaniDeparment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Elizabeth NanceeScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: eanance@uw.edu.

Funding

Quantitative 3D imaging of in situ nanoparticle movement and cellular behavior during neuroinflammationR35GM124677 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCE, ELIZABETH A · 2017 to 2022
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple-particle tracking (MPT) is a microscopy technique capable of simultaneously tracking hundreds to thousands of nanoparticles in a biological sample and has been used extensively to characterize biological microenvironments, including the brain extracellular space (ECS). Machine learning techniques have been applied to MPT data sets to predict the diffusion mode of nanoparticle trajectories as well as more complex biological variables, such as biological age. In this study, we develop a machine learning pipeline to predict and investigate changes to the brain ECS due to injury using supervised classification and feature importance calculations. We first validate the pipeline on three related but distinct MPT data sets from the living brain ECS-age differences, region differences, and enzymatic degradation of ECS structure. We predict three ages with 86% accuracy, three regions with 90% accuracy, and healthy versus enzyme-treated tissue with 69% accuracy. Since injury across groups is normally compared with traditional statistical approaches, we first used linear mixed effects models to compare features between healthy control conditions and injury induced by two different oxygen glucose deprivation exposure times. We then used machine learning to predict injury state using MPT features. We show that the pipeline predicts between the healthy control, 0.5 h OGD treatment, and 1.5 h OGD treatment with 59% accuracy in the cortex and 66% in the striatum, and identifies nonlinear relationships between trajectory features that were not evident from traditional linear models. Our work demonstrates that machine learning applied to MPT data is effective across multiple experimental conditions and can find unique biologically relevant features of nanoparticle diffusion.

Indexed as

BrainAnimalsCellular MicroenvironmentDiffusionExtracellular SpaceGlucoseMachine LearningMiceNanoparticlesGlucose

Identifiers

PMID39390745
PMCPMC11617630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.