ArticleBiophysical journal2024
High-fidelity predictions of diffusion in the brain microenvironment.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for extracellular vesicles enables diagnostic and therapeutic nanobiotechnology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Mind the gap: Exploring extracellular spaces in the brain with particle tracking and AI.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple-particle tracking (MPT) is a microscopy technique capable of simultaneously tracking hundreds to thousands of nanoparticles in a biological sample and has been used extensively to characterize biological microenvironments, including the brain extracellular space (ECS). Machine learning techniques have been applied to MPT data sets to predict the diffusion mode of nanoparticle trajectories as well as more complex biological variables, such as biological age. In this study, we develop a machine learning pipeline to predict and investigate changes to the brain ECS due to injury using supervised classification and feature importance calculations. We first validate the pipeline on three related but distinct MPT data sets from the living brain ECS-age differences, region differences, and enzymatic degradation of ECS structure. We predict three ages with 86% accuracy, three regions with 90% accuracy, and healthy versus enzyme-treated tissue with 69% accuracy. Since injury across groups is normally compared with traditional statistical approaches, we first used linear mixed effects models to compare features between healthy control conditions and injury induced by two different oxygen glucose deprivation exposure times. We then used machine learning to predict injury state using MPT features. We show that the pipeline predicts between the healthy control, 0.5 h OGD treatment, and 1.5 h OGD treatment with 59% accuracy in the cortex and 66% in the striatum, and identifies nonlinear relationships between trajectory features that were not evident from traditional linear models. Our work demonstrates that machine learning applied to MPT data is effective across multiple experimental conditions and can find unique biologically relevant features of nanoparticle diffusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.