Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390740›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Medicaid managed care restrictions on medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder.

Maureen T Stewart, Christina M Andrews, Sage R Feltus, Dominic Hodgkin, Constance M Horgan, Cindy Parks Thomas, Thuong Nong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maureen T StewartThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-0307
Christina M AndrewsArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Sage R FeltusThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Dominic HodgkinThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-9176
Constance M HorganThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Cindy Parks ThomasThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Thuong NongThe Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Research Support CoreP30DA035772 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI Maureen T Stewart · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
Examining opioid use disorder treatment in Medicaid managed care plans: policies and outcomesR01DA049776 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HODGKIN, DOMINIC, STEWART, MAUREEN T · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035772NIDA NIH HHS P30DA035772NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049776NIDA NIH HHS R01DA049776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether Medicaid managed care plan (MCP) utilization management policies for buprenorphine-naloxone and injectable naltrexone are related to key state Medicaid program policy decisions. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingWe abstracted data on state Medicaid regulatory and policy information from publicly available sources and publicly available insurance benefit documentation from all 241 Medicaid MCPs operating in 2021. STUDY

designIn this cross-sectional study, we used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine whether Medicaid MCP prior authorization and quantity limits on receipt of buprenorphine and injectable naltrexone were associated with key state Medicaid choices to leverage federal funds to expand coverage and eligibility (Medicaid expansion, 1115 waivers) and to regulate Medicaid MCPs (uniform preferred drug lists, medical loss ratio remittance). Models were adjusted for MCP characteristics, including profit status, behavioral health contracting arrangement, National Committee for Quality Assurance accreditation, size, market share, and state opioid overdose death rates. Average marginal effects (AME) were reported. PRINCIPAL

findingsUtilization management was common among MCPs, and restrictions were more commonly applied to buprenorphine than injectable naltrexone, despite its higher cost. States that required MCPs to comply with utilization management policies stipulated in a uniform preferred drug list were more likely to require prior authorization for buprenorphine (AME: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15-0.42) and injectable naltrexone (AME: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.38). MCPs in states that required plans to pay back earnings above a certain threshold were less likely to require prior authorization for buprenorphine (AME: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18).

conclusionsRestrictions on medications for opioid use disorder are widespread among MCPs and vary by medication. State Medicaid regulatory and policy characteristics were strongly linked to MCPs' utilization management approaches. State Medicaid policy and contracting approaches may be levers to eliminate utilization management restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder.

Indexed as

Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationManaged Care ProgramsMedicaidNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersBuprenorphineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNaltrexoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentPrior AuthorizationUnited StatesBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsMedicaid managed caremedications for OUDMOUDopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID39390740
PMCPMC12047690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.