ArticleJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2024
Patient-reported disease burden in the Accelerate Clinical Trials in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Study.
Article in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Development of Therapies for Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Recommendations for Trial Design, Endpoints, and Regulatory Pathways.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026Review
- Quantifying Disease Progression in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Type 1A Using Quantitative Muscle MRI and Clinical Outcomes.Neurology · 2026Article
- Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related neuropathies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Health Index (CMT-HI) is a disease-specific, patient-reported disease burden measure. As part of an international clinical trial readiness study, individuals with CMT1A (ages 18-75 years) underwent clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including the CMT-HI, to capture their longitudinal perspective on the disease burden.
methodsTwo hundred and fifteen participants underwent serial COAs including the CMT-HI, CMT Functional Outcome Measure (CMT-FOM), CMT Neuropathy Score (CMTNSv2R), and CMT Exam Score (CMTES/CMTES-R). Correlations between the total and subscale scores for the CMT-HI and other COAs were determined. Changes in the CMT-HI scores over 12 months were assessed using paired t-tests. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the CMT-HI and its subscales were calculated by anchoring to a participant global impression of change scale.
resultsAt baseline, CMT1A participants were 44.5 ± 15 years old (range: 18-75) and 58% were women. The mean CMT-HI was 25.7 ± 18.8 (range: 0-91.9; 100 reflecting maximal disease burden). The CMT-HI correlated with the CMT-FOM (r = .54, p < .0001), CMTNSv2R (r = .48, p < .0001), and CMTES/CMTES-R (r = .52/r = .54, p < .0001). Disease burden was greater in women than in men (CMT-HI 29.1 ± 19.1 vs. 21.2 ± 17.3, p = .001). Over 12 months, there was a nonsignificant mean increase in CMT-HI of 0.40 ± 10.0 (n = 189, p = .89). The MCID for the CMT-HI total score was 3.8 points (95% CI: 1.7-5.9). DISCUSSION: Patient-reported disease burden in CMT1A as measured by the CMT-HI is associated with measures of neurologic impairment and physical functioning. Women reported a higher disease burden than men. These data will inform the design of clinical trials in CMT1A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.