ArticleHuman genomics2024
Fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow composed of LUSH toolkit.
Article in Human genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pangenome of tetraploid wheat reveals the genetic architecture underlying domestication and genomic diversity for breeding.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- An open-source clinical bioinformatics pipeline for real-world NGS implementation: translating genomic variants into actionable treatment strategies in oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- A novel sequence-based transformer model architecture for integrating multi-omics data in preterm birth risk prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Learning-based parallel acceleration for HaplotypeCaller.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Identification, functional analysis, and clinical applications of defective viral genomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- A novel linear indexing method for strings under all internal nodes in a suffix tree.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming increasingly prevalent for molecular diagnosis, staging and prognosis because of its declining costs and the ability to detect nearly all genes associated with a patient's disease. The currently widely accepted variant calling pipeline, GATK, is limited in terms of its computational speed and efficiency, which cannot meet the growing analysis needs.
resultsHere, we propose a fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow that is purely composed of tools from LUSH toolkit. The precision and recall measurements indicate that both the LUSH and GATK pipelines exhibit high levels of consistency, with precision and recall rates exceeding 99% on the 30x NA12878 dataset. In terms of processing speed, the LUSH pipeline outperforms the GATK pipeline, completing 30x WGS data analysis in just 1.6 h, which is approximately 17 times faster than GATK. Notably, the LUSH_HC tool completes the processing from BAM to VCF in just 12 min, which is around 76 times faster than GATK.
conclusionThese findings suggest that the LUSH pipeline is a highly promising alternative to the GATK pipeline for WGS data analysis, with the potential to significantly improve bedside analysis of acutely ill patients, large-scale cohort data analysis, and high-throughput variant calling in crop breeding programs. Furthermore, the LUSH pipeline is highly scalable and easily deployable, allowing it to be readily applied to various scenarios such as clinical diagnosis and genomic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.