Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390608›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2024

Effects of dietary Lactobacillus postbiotics and bacitracin on the modulation of mucosa-associated microbiota and pattern recognition receptors affecting immunocompetence of jejunal mucosa in pigs challenged with enterotoxigenic F18

Marcos Elias Duarte, Zixiao Deng, Sung Woo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Post-weaning diarrhea caused by F18Microbiome research reports · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcos Elias DuarteDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 116 Polk Hall, Campus Box 7621, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Zixiao DengDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 116 Polk Hall, Campus Box 7621, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Sung Woo KimDepartment of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 116 Polk Hall, Campus Box 7621, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. sungwoo_kim@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-1943

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch 02893North Carolina Agricultural Foundation 660101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a threat to humans and animals that causes intestinal disorders. Antimicrobial resistance has urged alternatives, including Lactobacillus postbiotics, to mitigate the effects of enterotoxigenic E. coli.

methodsForty-eight newly weaned pigs were allotted to NC: no challenge/no supplement; PC: F18

resultsPC increased (P < 0.05) Helicobacter mastomyrinus whereas reduced (P < 0.05) Prevotella copri and P. stercorea compared to NC. The LPB increased (P < 0.05) P. stercorea and Dialister succinatiphilus compared with PC. The ATB increased (P < 0.05) Propionibacterium acnes, Corynebacterium glutamicum, and Sphingomonas pseudosanguinis compared to PC. The PC tended to reduce (P = 0.054) PGLYRP4 and increased (P < 0.05) TLR4, CD14, MDA, and crypt cell proliferation compared with NC. The ATB reduced (P < 0.05) NOD1 compared with PC. The LPB increased (P < 0.05) PGLYRP4, and interferon-γ and reduced (P < 0.05) NOD1 compared with PC. The ATB and LPB reduced (P < 0.05) TNF-α and MDA compared with PC.

conclusionsThe F18

Indexed as

Escherichia coliImmunocompetenceIntestinal healthPattern recognition receptorsPigs

Identifiers

PMID39390608
PMCPMC11468193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.