Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390604›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024

A deep learning model to enhance the classification of primary bone tumors based on incomplete multimodal images in X-ray, CT, and MRI.

Liwen Song, Chuanpu Li, Lilian Tan, Menghong Wang, Xiaqing Chen, Qiang Ye, Shisi Li, Rui Zhang, Qinghai Zeng, Zhuoyao Xie and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Is orthopaedics entering the age of generative AI?-A narrative review of current applications challenges and future directions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Beyond traditional orthopaedic data analysis: AI, multimodal models and continuous monitoring.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Liwen Song *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chuanpu Li *School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lilian Tan *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Menghong WangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaqing ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qiang YeDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shisi LiDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qinghai ZengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhuoyao Xie *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. zhuoyao120@163.com.
Wei Yang *School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. weiyanggm@gmail.com.
Yinghua Zhao *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (Academy of Orthopedics, Guangdong Province), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. zhaoyh@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately classifying primary bone tumors is crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend multimodal images to provide different perspectives for the comprehensive evaluation of primary bone tumors. However, in clinical practice, most patients' medical multimodal images are often incomplete. This study aimed to build a deep learning model using patients' incomplete multimodal images from X-ray, CT, and MRI alongside clinical characteristics to classify primary bone tumors as benign, intermediate, or malignant.

methodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 1305 patients with histopathologically confirmed primary bone tumors (internal dataset, n = 1043; external dataset, n = 262) were included from two centers between January 2010 and December 2022. We proposed a Primary Bone Tumor Classification Transformer Network (PBTC-TransNet) fusion model to classify primary bone tumors. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the model's classification performance.

resultsThe PBTC-TransNet fusion model achieved satisfactory micro-average AUCs of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.832, 0.862) and 0.782 (95% CI: 0.749, 0.817) on the internal and external test sets. For the classification of benign, intermediate, and malignant primary bone tumors, the model respectively achieved AUCs of 0.827/0.727, 0.740/0.662, and 0.815/0.745 on the internal/external test sets. Furthermore, across all patient subgroups stratified by the distribution of imaging modalities, the PBTC-TransNet fusion model gained micro-average AUCs ranging from 0.700 to 0.909 and 0.640 to 0.847 on the internal and external test sets, respectively. The model showed the highest micro-average AUC of 0.909, accuracy of 84.3%, micro-average sensitivity of 84.3%, and micro-average specificity of 92.1% in those with only X-rays on the internal test set. On the external test set, the PBTC-TransNet fusion model gained the highest micro-average AUC of 0.847 for patients with X-ray + CT.

conclusionsWe successfully developed and externally validated the transformer-based PBTC-Transnet fusion model for the effective classification of primary bone tumors. This model, rooted in incomplete multimodal images and clinical characteristics, effectively mirrors real-life clinical scenarios, thus enhancing its strong clinical practicability.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBone neoplasmsClassificationComputer-assisted diagnosisDeep learningMultimodal imaging

Identifiers

PMID39390604
PMCPMC11468403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.