Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390583›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

A multicentric, randomized, controlled clinical trial to study the impact of bedside model-informed precision dosing of vancomycin in critically ill children-BENEFICIAL trial.

Pieter A De Cock, Roos Colman, Anca Amza, Peter De Paepe, Hans De Pla, Lieselot Vanlanduyt, Dimitri Van der Linden, Beneficial Trial Consortium

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. State of Vancomycin Dosing in Neonates: An Overview.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pieter A De CockDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. pieter.decock@uzgent.be.
Roos ColmanBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Anca AmzaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ghent University Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter De PaepeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ghent University Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Hans De PlaHealth, Innovation and Research Institute, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Lieselot VanlanduytHealth, Innovation and Research Institute, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Dimitri Van der LindenDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Specialized Pediatric Service, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Beneficial Trial Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVancomycin is a commonly prescribed antibiotic to treat serious Gram-positive infections in children. The efficacy of vancomycin is known to be directly related to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) divided by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen. In most countries, steady-state plasma concentrations are used as a surrogate parameter for this target AUC/MIC, but this practice has some drawbacks. Hence, AUC-based dosing using model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) tools has been proposed for increasing the target attainment rate and reducing vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity. Solid scientific evidence for these claimed benefits is lacking in children. This randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the large-scale utility of MIPD dosing of vancomycin in critically ill children.

methodsParticipants from 14 neonatal intensive care, pediatric intensive care, and pediatric hemo-oncology ward units from 7 hospitals are randomly allocated to the intervention or standard-of-care comparator group. In the intervention group, a MIPD dosing calculator is used for AUC-based dosing, in combination with extra sampling for therapeutic drug monitoring in the first hours of treatment, as compared to standard-of-care. An AUC24h between 400 and 600 is targeted, assuming an MIC of 1 mg/L. Patients in the comparator group receive standard-of-care dosing and monitoring according to institutional guidelines. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching the target AUC24h/MIC of 400-600 between 24 and 48 h after the start of vancomycin treatment. Secondary endpoints are the proportion of patients with (worsening) acute kidney injury during vancomycin treatment, the proportion of patients reaching target AUC24h/MIC of 400-600 between 48 and 72 h after the start of vancomycin treatment, time to clinical cure, ward unit length-of-stay, hospital length-of-stay, and 30-day all-cause mortality. DISCUSSION: This trial will clarify the propagated benefits and provide new insights into how to optimally monitor vancomycin treatment in critically ill children.

trial registrationEudract number: 2019-004538-40. Registered on 2020-09-08 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT046666948. Registered on 2020-11-28.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveCritical IllnessDrug MonitoringVancomycinChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinArea under the concentration–time curve dosingCritically ill childrenModel-informed precision dosingRandomized controlled trialTherapeutic drug monitoringVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39390583
PMCPMC11466033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.