Comprehensive assessment of heavy slow resistance training and high-dose therapeutic ultrasound in managing patellar tendinopathy, a randomized single-blind controlled trial.

backgroundPatellar tendinopathy (PT) is a common sport injury prone to recurrence. Heavy Slow Resistance Training (HSR) and High-Dose Therapeutic Ultrasound (TUS) are frequently used interventions for PT. However, the combined effectiveness of these therapies remains unclear. This study investigated the impact of combination therapy on functional outcomes in patients with PT.

methodsFifty-one college students aged 18-25, diagnosed with PT via musculoskeletal ultrasound, were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 17 per group): combined HSR and high-dose TUS, HSR training alone, or high-dose TUS alone. The eight-week intervention included assessments using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Y-balance Test (YBT), Modified Thomas Test (MTT), Horizontal Jumping Distance, Maximum Isometric Muscle Strength Test, and musculoskeletal ultrasound for patellar tendon thickness and blood flow. Assessments were conducted at baseline and post-intervention, with a follow-up VISA-P assessment at week 16. This randomized, single-blind controlled trial was registered on ISRCTN11447397 ( www.ISRCTN.com ) on February 17, 2024 (retrospectively registered).

resultsAll groups demonstrated significant improvements in VISA-P scores at the end of the intervention compared to baseline (p < 0.01), with the combined group showing the greatest improvement (21 points). Follow-up at week 16 revealed continued improvement in VISA-P scores for the combined and HSR groups, while the TUS group showed a slight decrease (from 74 to 70). All groups displayed significantly reduced VAS scores post-intervention (p < 0.01) compared to baseline, indicating decreased pain. While no significant between-group differences were observed in pre-intervention VAS scores, post-intervention results revealed significant differences between the combined and HSR groups (p < 0.05), as well as between the combined and TUS groups (p < 0.01).

conclusionBoth exercise intervention and high-dose TUS appear effective in reducing pain and improving motor function in individuals with PT. However, the therapeutic effect of high-dose TUS alone seems limited compared to exercise intervention. The combined application of both methods yielded the most significant improvements in pain relief and motor function enhancement.