ArticleBMC medical education2024
The "flipped visit": an innovative method to improve medical student self-efficacy through a structured approach in clinic.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecialty clinics can be challenging for students on the internal medicine clerkship. They often lack the specialized knowledge necessary to fully engage in the clinic and may be pushed into an observational role, rather than being afforded meaningful opportunities. These peripheral roles undermine self-efficacy, and, therefore, education and interest. We sought to improve self-efficacy of students attending non-malignant hematology clinic, as well as to enhance interest in hematology and internal medicine.
methodsWe developed a flipped visit model analogous to the flipped classroom. Students each received pre-readings accompanied and pre-assigned cases with delineated reasons for referral and learning objectives. This model allowed students to prepare the hematology content for visits prior to arrival and then focus their time in clinic on executing visits. Participating students completed pre- and post-clinic surveys. These surveys covered core concepts in self-efficacy and interest in hematology and internal medicine on a five-point Likert scale.
resultsOf 103 students attending hematology clinic, 38 students (37%) opted to participate. Two of the 38 did not complete the post-clinic survey. Students had a statistically significant increase in four of six measures of self-efficacy: evaluation of research relevant to patient care and practicing cost-effective care (p = 0.008 and 0.001, respectively); and creation of a differential diagnosis and treatment plan specific to hematology (both p < 0.001). While pre-clinic student responses expressed interest in more exposure to hematology or a possible career in hematology or internal medicine, this was not changed post-clinic. When comparing their experience to other clinics, 75% and 71% students rated hematology clinic slightly or much better than other medicine clinics and non-medicine clinics, respectively. The flipped visit improved self-efficacy both specific to hematology and more generally. While students rated the experience more highly than other clinics, there was no impact on career interest in hematology or internal medicine.
conclusionA flipped visit approach to incorporating medical students into hematology clinic that included pre-assigned cases and readings improved self-efficacy and was preferred by students. They may be adopted easily in other ambulatory education settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.