Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390536›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2024

Lowering the burden: Shorter versions of the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) and Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT).

Sara Malone, Kim Prewitt, Virginia McKay, Luke Zabotka, Caren Bacon, Douglas A Luke

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07387393 (Peau o le Vasa), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07387393 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Peau o le Vasa: Accelerating the Currents of Health Advances for Pasifika People

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HawaiiRan2026 to 2028Enrolled400ConditionsCardiometabolic Conditions, Hypertension (HTN), Dyslipidemia, Pre-diabetesArmsPILI (Partnership for Improving Lifestyle Intervention) Pasifika Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contextual factors of implementing APOL1 genetic testing into living kidney donor clinical evaluation.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara MaloneDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 600 S Taylor Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. Sara.malone@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-8733
Kim PrewittCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Virginia McKayCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Luke ZabotkaDivision of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 600 S Taylor Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Caren BaconCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Douglas A LukeCenter for Public Health Systems Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
Sustainability determinants of an intervention to identify clinical deterioration and improve childhood cancer survival in low-resource hospitalsR37CA276215 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Asya Agulnik, Virginia R McKay · 2023 to 2026
$3.5M
CDC HHS 75D301-20-R-68063NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NCI NIH HHS P50CA244431NCI NIH HHS R37 CA276215NCI NIH HHS R37CA276215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough significant advances have been made in the conceptualization of sustainability, having pragmatic, psychometrically valid tools remains a need within the field. Our previous work has developed frameworks and tools to assess both program sustainability and clinical sustainability capacity. This work presents new, psychometrically tested short versions of the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) and the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT).

methodsThese methods were conducted in identical, parallel processes for the CSAT and PSAT. Previously collected data for these instruments was obtained across a variety of settings, contexts, and participants. We first conducted testing to determine cronbach's alpha of shortened domains (3 items each) and then conducted Confirmatory Factor Analysis to ensure that the domains were still appropriate for the tool. After, the team met to review the results and determine the final versions of the short PSAT and short CSAT.

resultsThe short PSAT retained cronbach's alpha's of 0.82 - 0.91 for each domain of the tool, with which maintains excellent reliability for the tool. Confirmatory factor analysis highlights that the short PSAT retains conceptual distinction across the 8 domains, with CFI scores greater than 0.90, RMSEA scores below 0.6, and SRMR scores less than 0.08. The short CSAT had cronbach's alpha of 0.84 - 0.92 for each of the domains of the tool, also suggesting excellent reliability of the domains within the measure after dropping two items/domain. Confirmatory factor analysis of the short CSAT meets the same specifications as above, again highlighting conceptual distinction across the domains.

conclusionEach tool was able to be shortened to three items per domain while maintaining strong psychometric properties. This results in a tool that takes less time to complete, meeting one of the key calls for pragmatic measures within implementation science. This advances our abilities to measure and test sustainability within implementation science.

Indexed as

Clinical sustainabilityMeasurement developmentOrganizational capacityProgram sustainabilityPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID39390536
PMCPMC11468075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.