Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390490›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Automatic maxillary sinus segmentation and pathology classification on cone-beam computed tomographic images using deep learning.

Oğuzhan Altun, Duygu Çelik Özen, Şuayip Burak Duman, Numan Dedeoğlu, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Gözde Eşer, Özer Çelik, Muhammed Akif Sümbüllü, Ali Zakir Syed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oğuzhan AltunDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Duygu Çelik ÖzenDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Şuayip Burak DumanDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey. suayipburakduman@gmail.com.
Numan DedeoğluDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
İbrahim Şevki BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Gözde EşerDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Science, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Muhammed Akif SümbüllüDepartment of Oral and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ali Zakir SyedDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

İnönü Üniversitesi TSG-2021-2714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaxillofacial complex automated segmentation could alternative traditional segmentation methods to increase the effectiveness of virtual workloads. The use of DL systems in the detection of maxillary sinus and pathologies will both facilitate the work of physicians and be a support mechanism before the planned surgeries.

objectiveThe aim was to use a modified You Only Look Oncev5x (YOLOv5x) architecture with transfer learning capabilities to segment both maxillary sinuses and maxillary sinus diseases on Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic (CBCT) images.

methodsData set consists of 307 anonymised CBCT images of patients (173 women and 134 males) obtained from the radiology archive of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Bilateral maxillary sinuses CBCT scans were used to identify mucous retention cysts (MRC), mucosal thickenings (MT), total and partial opacifications, and healthy maxillary sinuses without any radiological features.

resultsRecall, precision and F1 score values for total maxillary sinus segmentation were 1, 0.985 and 0.992, respectively; 1, 0.931 and 0.964 for healthy maxillary sinus segmentation; 0.858, 0.923 and 0.889 for MT segmentation; 0.977, 0.877 and 0.924 for MRC segmentation; 1, 0.942 and 0.970 for sinusitis segmentation.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that maxillary sinuses can be segmented, and maxillary sinus diseases can be accurately detected using the AI model.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningMaxillary SinusAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanasal Sinus DiseasesArtificial intelligenceCone beam computed tomographyDeep learningMaxillary sinus

Identifiers

PMID39390490
PMCPMC11468140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.