ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
Distributed impact of severe mental health conditions in rural Ethiopia, a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of community-based rehabilitation on caregivers of people with schizophrenia in Ethiopia in the RISE trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- "I think there is a certain worm that disturbs the head": Community perspectives and care pathways for psychosis in Malawi.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Experiences, needs and priorities of family caregivers of people with severe mental health conditions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of qualitative studies.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore the distributed impact of severe mental health conditions (SMHCs) among people with lived experience of SMHCs, their family members, and community members.
methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with family key informants of people with SMHCs (n = 32), people with SMHCs (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression) (n = 10), and community members (n = 6) in rural Ethiopia. The study was nested within a long-standing population-based cohort of people with SMHCs. Interviews were conducted in Amharic and were audiotaped. We conducted a thematic analysis.
resultsWe identified four themes: stress and physical tolls, lost expectations, social disruption, and economic threat. Family members reported stress and hopelessness; some also tried to harm themselves. Family members reported that their relationships with each other and with the wider community were disrupted significantly. Spouses and children did not get the support they needed, leading to unmet expectations: being left alone to care for children, unable to go to school or dropping out early. The study participants with SMHCs also spoke about the impacts of their illness on other family members and the community which appeared to be a source of shame and self-isolation. Both the family and the community respondents reported the economic effect of the illness which sometimes led to selling assets, debt, unemployment, forced migration, and food insecurity. Community members emphasised the economic burden and danger related to the aggressive behavior of the person with SMHCs, while the person with the illness and their family members blamed the community for the stigma and discrimination they experienced.
conclusionSMHCs have profound consequences for the person with the illness, their family members, and the community. Future interventions for SMHCs should consider household-level interventions to address economic and care needs and mitigate the intergenerational impact. The community should be considered as a resource as well as a target for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.