Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390447›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Psychological distress among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: patterns over time.

Iris Gutmanis, Brenda L Coleman, Kelly Ramsay, Robert Maunder, Susan J Bondy, CCS Working Group, Allison McGeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Elevated levels of mental health issues among optometrists in the United Kingdom.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iris Gutmanis *Sinai Health, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
Brenda L Coleman *Sinai Health, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada. b.coleman@utoronto.ca.
Kelly RamsayYork University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Robert MaunderSinai Health, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
Susan J BondyUniversity of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada.
CCS Working Group
Allison McGeerSinai Health, 600 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 173212 & 18116Physician Services Incorporated Foundation 6014200738Public Health Agency of Canada 2021-HQ-000149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 added to healthcare provider (HCP) distress, but patterns of change remain unclear. This study sought to determine if and how emotional distress varied among HCP between March 28, 2021 and December 1, 2023.

methodsThis longitudinal study was embedded within the 42-month prospective COVID-19 Cohort Study that recruited HCP from four Canadian provinces. Information was collected at enrollment, from annual exposure surveys, and vaccination and illness surveys. The 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) was completed approximately every six months after March 28, 2021. Linear mixed effects models, specifically random intercept models, were generated to determine the impact of time on emotional distress while accounting for demographic and work-related factors.

resultsBetween 2021 and 2023, the mean K10 score fell by 3.1 points, indicating decreased distress, but scores increased during periods of high levels of mitigation strategies against transmission of SARS-CoV-2, during winter months, and if taking antidepression, anti-anxiety or anti-insomnia medications. K10 scores were significantly lower for HCP who were male, older, had more children in their household, experienced prior COVID-19 illness(es), and for non-physician but regulated HCP versus nurses. A sensitivity analysis that included only those who had submitted at least five K10 surveys consisted of the factors in the full model excluding previous COVID-19 illness, occupation, and season, after adjustment. Models were also created for K10 anxiety and depression subscales.

conclusionsK10 scores decreased as the COVID-19 pandemic continued but increased during periods of high mitigation and the winter months. Personal and work-place factors also impacted HCP distress scores. Further research into best practices in distress identification and remediation is warranted to ensure future public health disasters are met with healthcare systems that are able to buffer HCP against short- and long-term mental health issues.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelPsychological DistressAdultCanadaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare providerPandemicPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID39390447
PMCPMC11465806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.