Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390377›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

Influences on the duration and success of out-of-hospital resuscitation of geriatric patients over 80 years of age - a retrospective evaluation.

Nils Heuser, Dennis Rupp, Susanne Glass, Martin Christian Sassen, Astrid Morin, Christian Volberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nils HeuserDepartment of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Dennis RuppEMS Mittelhessen, German Red Cross, Marburg, Germany.
Susanne GlassDepartment of Emergency Medicine, DGD Diakonie-Hospital Wehrda, Hebronberg 5, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Martin Christian SassenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, DGD Diakonie-Hospital Wehrda, Hebronberg 5, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Astrid MorinDepartment of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Christian VolbergDepartment of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043, Marburg, Germany. christian.volberg@staff.uni-marburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSociety is experiencing an increasing shift in the age distribution and accordingly, increased resuscitation rates of patients over 80 years and older. In 2022, more than 34% of people resuscitated in Germany were older than 80 years, although older age is considered a poor predictor for the outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Professional societies provide ethical recommendations on when resuscitation may be considered futile and should be terminated. However, the extent to which these recommendations are implemented is unclear.

methodsRetrospective evaluation of pre-hospital documentation of out-of-hospital resuscitations in patients ≥ 80 years of age in the period 01/01/2014-12/31/2022 in one German county combined with data of the German Resuscitation Registry. For statistical testing, the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

resultsIn total 578 cases were analyzed. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC): 26% (n = 148). Survival to discharge: 6.1% (n = 35). Median CPR duration: 17 min (10-28 min). The older the patients were, the worse the survival rate (p = 0.05) and the shorter the time to termination (p < 0.0001). No patient over 90 years of age was discharged alive. Resuscitation was also significantly shorter until termination with poorer ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score (p < 0.001). Residents resuscitated significantly longer than specialists (p = 0.02). In surviving patients, there was a significant correlation between short CPR duration and good cerebral performance category (CPC) value: Median CPC1/2 = 5 min [3-10 min] vs. CPC 3/4 = 18 min [10-21 min]; p = 0.01.

interpretationOld age and poor health status is associated with shorter CPR duration until termination and older age is associated with poorer prognosis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) concerning the possibility of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival. A short resuscitation time is associated with a better CPC value. Therefore, when resuscitating patients over 80 years of age, even greater care should be taken to ensure that reversible causes are quickly corrected in order to achieve a ROSC and a good neurological outcome. Alternatively, resuscitation should be terminated promptly, as good survival can no longer be guaranteed. Resuscitation lasting more than 20 min should be avoided in any case, in line with the termination of resuscitation (ToR) criteria.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAged, 80 and overAge FactorsEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsCardiopulmonary resuscitationElderlyGeriatricsOut of hospital cardiac arrestTermination of resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID39390377
PMCPMC11468061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.