ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
A multi-task graph deep learning model to predict drugs combination of synergy and sensitivity scores.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A systematic study of parameter sharing strategies in multi-task learning for drug synergy and sensitivity prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Research progress of artificial intelligence in high-throughput drug screening.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- A directed weighted network-based method for drug combinations identification using drug-target and inter-target regulation.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- AI-powered IC50 prediction for p53 inhibitors drug-target interaction via hybrid graph neural networks.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- A review of deep learning approaches for drug synergy prediction in cancer.npj drug discovery · 2025Review
- SenolyticSynergy: An Attention-Based Network for Discovering Novel Senolytic Combinations via Human Aging Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug combination treatments have proven to be a realistic technique for treating challenging diseases such as cancer by enhancing efficacy and mitigating side effects. To achieve the therapeutic goals of these combinations, it is essential to employ multi-targeted drug combinations, which maximize effectiveness and synergistic effects.
resultsThis paper proposes 'MultiComb', a multi-task deep learning (MTDL) model designed to simultaneously predict the synergy and sensitivity of drug combinations. The model utilizes a graph convolution network to represent the Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry (SMILES) of two drugs, generating their respective features. Also, three fully connected subnetworks extract features of the cancer cell line. These drug and cell line features are then concatenated and processed through an attention mechanism, which outputs two optimized feature representations for the target tasks. The cross-stitch model learns the relationship between these tasks. At last, each learned task feature is fed into fully connected subnetworks to predict the synergy and sensitivity scores. The proposed model is validated using the O'Neil benchmark dataset, which includes 38 unique drugs combined to form 17,901 drug combination pairs and tested across 37 unique cancer cells. The model's performance is tested using some metrics like mean square error (
conclusionThis paper proposes an MTDL model to predict synergy and sensitivity scores for drug combinations targeting specific cancer cell lines. The MTDL model demonstrates superior performance compared to existing approaches, providing better results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.