SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Prevalence and assessment of sleep-disordered breathing in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesSleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a very common and underdiagnosed condition in head and neck cancers (HNC) patients. If untreated, SDB can lead to negative health consequences. The identification of SDB in HNC patients is crucial to ensure appropriate treatment and to improve outcomes. The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence of coexisting SDB in HNC patients and to evaluate methods of assessing SDB in the population.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Database, the Web of Science, and Scopus was performed for studies related to SDB in HNC patients. In total, 1713 articles were identified. 19 articles were selected for qualitative synthesis. The studies involved 584 subjects.
resultsThe prevalence of SDB ranged from 57 to 90% before cancer treatment and from 12 to 96% after. When using an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut-off ≥ 5/h to diagnosis SDB, the prevalence of SDB was 57-90% before cancer treatment and 12-94% after treatment. Sleep studies using polysomnography are the most commonly used assessment tools, but thresholds for diagnosis have been inconsistent.
conclusionsThere is a high prevalence of SDB in HNC patients. However, the diagnostic and thresholds methods used for detecting SDB vary widely. To determine the accurate prevalence of SDB, prospective, systematic studies of SDB in unselected cohorts of HNC participants are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39390313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.