Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390309›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2024

Novel Therapies for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphomas.

Elisa Aquilanti, Elizabeth Herrity, Lakshmi Nayak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisa AquilantiCenter for Neuro Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth HerrityDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Hans Messner Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lakshmi NayakCenter for Neuro Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Lakshmi_Nayak@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPrimary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive form of lymphoma that can involve the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and eyes. PCNSL prognosis continues to be poor, with 5-year survival rates of 30-40%. Therapeutic options are especially limited for relapsed/refractory (r/r) PCNSL. In recent years, studies shed light on the pathogenesis and oncogenic pathways driving PCNSL, leading to the development of novel therapeutics. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting these novel agents and present ongoing clinical studies. RECENT

findingsKey oncogenic drivers of PCNSL include activation of the NFkB pathway, cell cycle dysregulation, somatic hypermutation and immune evasion, leading to the investigation of targeted therapeutics and immunotherapeutics to inhibit these pathways. Such approaches include BTK inhibitors, mTOR/PI3K inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents (IMIDs), immune checkpoint inhibitors and CD19-based CAR T-cells. The therapeutic repertoire for PCNSL is rapidly evolving, and a multi-modality approach including intensive chemotherapy regimens and novel therapies will likely be utilized in the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsLymphomaClinical Studies as TopicHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunomodulating AgentsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunomodulating AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsCAR T-cell therapyCNS LymphomaImmunotherapyNovel therapiesTargeted therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.