ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2024
Material-Sparing Approach to Predict Tablet Capping Under Processing Compression Conditions Based on Mechanical and Molecular Properties Derived from Compaction Simulation and Crystal Structural Analysis.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Present study evaluates the usability of compaction simulation-based mechanical models as a material-sparing approach to predict tablet capping under processing compression conditions using Acetaminophen (APAP) and Ibuprofen (IBU). Measured mechanical properties were evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA) and principal component regression (PCR) models. PCR models were then utilized to predict the capping score (CS) from compression pressure (CP). APAP formulations displayed a quadratic correlation between CS and CP, with CS rank order following CP of 200MPa < 300MPa < 100MPa, indicating threshold compression pressure (TCP) limit between 200 and 300 MPa, resulting in higher CS at 300 than 200 MPa regardless of increased CP. IBU formulations displayed a linear correlation between CS and CP, with CS rank order following CP of 100MPa < 200MPa < 300MPa, indicating TCP limit between 100 and 200 MPa, resulting in higher CS at 200 and 300 than 100 MPa regardless of increased CP. Molecular models were developed as validation methods to predict capping from CP. Measured XRPD patterns of compressed tablets were linked with calculated Eatt and d-spacing of slip planes and analyzed using variable component least square methods to predict TCP triggering cleavage in slip planes and leading to capping. In APAP and IBU, TCP values were predicted at 245 and 175 MPa, meaning capped tablets above these TCP limits regardless of increased CP. A similar trend was observed in CS predictions from mechanical assessment, confirming that compaction simulation-based mechanical models can predict capping risk under desired compression conditions rapidly and accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39390268What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.