ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Automatic structuring of radiology reports with on-premise open-source large language models.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of Natural Language Processing Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary attitudes towards LLM-structured oncologic CT reports: a prospective fixed-sequence questionnaire study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Automated Identification of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Cardiac Catheterization Reports using Large Language Models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Multi-reader, multi-model benchmark of large language models for modified Outerbridge cartilage grading from knee MRI reports.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Large language models decode narrative pathology reports to define clinically relevant subtypes in IgA nephropathy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Comparison of proprietary and fine-tuned large language models for multi-label classification of billing codes from radiology reports.European radiology · 2026Article
- [Keeping track of things: large language models for patient synopses : Source-bound system for clinical information systems].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Pre-Imaging Clinical Factors Associated With Cardiac MR Image Quality Using Large Language Model-Enabled Data Extraction.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Implementing a Resource-Light and Low-Code Large Language Model System for Information Extraction from Mammography Reports: A Pilot Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Who labels best? Radiologists, rules, or large language models for CT reports on pulmonary embolism.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- How green are large language models for radiology report labelling? Comparing human, rule-based and hybrid workflows.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- BI-RADS-compliant structured mammography reporting using locally deployed large language models under privacy constraints.European radiology · 2026Article
- Improving reliability and accuracy of structured data extraction using a consensus large-language model approach-a use case description in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Case-matched retrieval improves textual alignment of LLM-generated radiology impressions.PloS one · 2026Article
- Zero-Shot PI-RADS Version 2.1 Scoring with ChatGPT-4 Turbo and Llama 3: Diagnostic Performance and Agreement with Abdominal Radiologists.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Trends and Trajectories in the Rise of Large Language Models in Radiology: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Automated Resectability Classification of Pancreatic Cancer CT Reports with Privacy-Preserving Open-Weight Large Language Models: A Multicenter Study.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Evaluating prompt and data perturbation sensitivity in large language models for radiology reports classification.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Synthetic data trained open-source language models are feasible alternatives to proprietary models for radiology reporting.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesStructured reporting enhances comparability, readability, and content detail. Large language models (LLMs) could convert free text into structured data without disrupting radiologists' reporting workflow. This study evaluated an on-premise, privacy-preserving LLM for automatically structuring free-text radiology reports. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed an approach to controlling the LLM output, ensuring the validity and completeness of structured reports produced by a locally hosted Llama-2-70B-chat model. A dataset with de-identified narrative chest radiograph (CXR) reports was compiled retrospectively. It included 202 English reports from a publicly available MIMIC-CXR dataset and 197 German reports from our university hospital. Senior radiologist prepared a detailed, fully structured reporting template with 48 question-answer pairs. All reports were independently structured by the LLM and two human readers. Bayesian inference (Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling) was used to estimate the distributions of Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), with [-0.05, 0.05] as the region of practical equivalence (ROPE).
resultsThe LLM generated valid structured reports in all cases, achieving an average MCC of 0.75 (94% HDI: 0.70-0.80) and F1 score of 0.70 (0.70-0.80) for English, and 0.66 (0.62-0.70) and 0.68 (0.64-0.72) for German reports, respectively. The MCC differences between LLM and humans were within ROPE for both languages: 0.01 (-0.05 to 0.07), 0.01 (-0.05 to 0.07) for English, and -0.01 (-0.07 to 0.05), 0.00 (-0.06 to 0.06) for German, indicating approximately comparable performance.
conclusionLocally hosted, open-source LLMs can automatically structure free-text radiology reports with approximately human accuracy. However, the understanding of semantics varied across languages and imaging findings. KEY POINTS: Question Why has structured reporting not been widely adopted in radiology despite clear benefits and how can we improve this? Findings A locally hosted large language model successfully structured narrative reports, showing variation between languages and findings. Critical relevance Structured reporting provides many benefits, but its integration into the clinical routine is limited. Automating the extraction of structured information from radiology reports enables the capture of structured data while allowing the radiologist to maintain their reporting workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.