Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390261›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Automatic structuring of radiology reports with on-premise open-source large language models.

Piotr Woźnicki, Caroline Laqua, Ina Fiku, Amar Hekalo, Daniel Truhn, Sandy Engelhardt, Jakob Kather, Sebastian Foersch, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multidisciplinary attitudes towards LLM-structured oncologic CT reports: a prospective fixed-sequence questionnaire study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Piotr WoźnickiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. woznicki_p@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-3785
Caroline LaquaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ina FikuDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Amar HekaloDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Daniel TruhnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sandy EngelhardtDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jakob KatherDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian FoerschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Tugba Akinci D'AntonoliInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Bettina BaeßlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Fabian Christopher LaquaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KD2215A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStructured reporting enhances comparability, readability, and content detail. Large language models (LLMs) could convert free text into structured data without disrupting radiologists' reporting workflow. This study evaluated an on-premise, privacy-preserving LLM for automatically structuring free-text radiology reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed an approach to controlling the LLM output, ensuring the validity and completeness of structured reports produced by a locally hosted Llama-2-70B-chat model. A dataset with de-identified narrative chest radiograph (CXR) reports was compiled retrospectively. It included 202 English reports from a publicly available MIMIC-CXR dataset and 197 German reports from our university hospital. Senior radiologist prepared a detailed, fully structured reporting template with 48 question-answer pairs. All reports were independently structured by the LLM and two human readers. Bayesian inference (Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling) was used to estimate the distributions of Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), with [-0.05, 0.05] as the region of practical equivalence (ROPE).

resultsThe LLM generated valid structured reports in all cases, achieving an average MCC of 0.75 (94% HDI: 0.70-0.80) and F1 score of 0.70 (0.70-0.80) for English, and 0.66 (0.62-0.70) and 0.68 (0.64-0.72) for German reports, respectively. The MCC differences between LLM and humans were within ROPE for both languages: 0.01 (-0.05 to 0.07), 0.01 (-0.05 to 0.07) for English, and -0.01 (-0.07 to 0.05), 0.00 (-0.06 to 0.06) for German, indicating approximately comparable performance.

conclusionLocally hosted, open-source LLMs can automatically structure free-text radiology reports with approximately human accuracy. However, the understanding of semantics varied across languages and imaging findings. KEY POINTS: Question Why has structured reporting not been widely adopted in radiology despite clear benefits and how can we improve this? Findings A locally hosted large language model successfully structured narrative reports, showing variation between languages and findings. Critical relevance Structured reporting provides many benefits, but its integration into the clinical routine is limited. Automating the extraction of structured information from radiology reports enables the capture of structured data while allowing the radiologist to maintain their reporting workflow.

Indexed as

Radiography, ThoracicRadiology Information SystemsHumansLarge Language ModelsRetrospective StudiesChest radiographyLarge language modelsStructured reporting

Identifiers

PMID39390261
PMCPMC11913902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.