Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390251›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Nadia Øgaard, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft, Christina Demuth, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Jesper Nors, Amanda Frydendahl, Iben Lyskjær, Marijana Nesic and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Nadia Øgaard *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sarah Østrup Jensen *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-4353
Christina DemuthDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mads Heilskov RasmussenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5723-6303
Tenna Vesterman HenriksenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper NorsDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-7263
Amanda FrydendahlDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Iben LyskjærDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1182
Marijana NesicDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christina TherkildsenGastro Unit, Surgical Section, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2833-6986
Jakob KleifGastro Unit, Surgical Section, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-0410
Mikail GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Lars Nannestad JørgensenDigestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper VilandtDepartment of Surgery, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Jakob Benedict SeidelinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Kåre Anderson GotschalckInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-2231
Claudia JaenschDepartment of Surgery, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Berit AndersenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Uffe Schou LøveDepartment of Surgery, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark.
Ole Thorlacius-UssingClinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Per Vadgaard AndersenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Thomas KolbroDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.
Alessio MontiDepartment of Surgery, North Denmark Regional Hospital Hjørring, Hjørring, Denmark.
Jeppe KildsigDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter BondevenDepartment of Surgery, Regional Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark.
Nis Hallundbæk SchlesingerDigestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene Hjerrild IversenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten RasmussenDigestive Disease Centre, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ismail GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Jesper Bertram BramsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Claus Lindbjerg AndersenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. cla@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7406-2103

Funding

Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond (Aage and Johanne Louis-Hansen Foundation) 18-2B-2525Cancer Research UK 26932Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C6199/A26932Det Frie Forskningsråd (Danish Council for Independent Research) 1309-00006BInnovationsfonden (Innovation Fund Denmark) 9068-00046BNovo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF17OC0025052; NNF22OC0074415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a 'low-ctDNA-shedding' and 'less-aggressive' subgroup.

methodsctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722).

resultsAfter adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2-0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5-0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3-1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2-0.6).

conclusionsOur study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a 'low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk' subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID39390251
PMCPMC11555384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.