Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390244›Full record

ReviewCommunications chemistry2024

Quasicrystal synthesis by shock compression.

Jinping Hu, Paul D Asimow, Chi Ma, Paul J Steinhardt, Luca Bindi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinping HuDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA. jinping@caltech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0415-4616
Paul D AsimowDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-8925
Chi MaDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-7033
Paul J SteinhardtDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
Luca BindiDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy. luca.bindi@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1168-7306

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) SSW-80NSSC21K1806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quasicrystals are of interest because of their unique nonperiodic structures and physical properties. Motivated by naturally occurring icosahedral AlCuFe- and decagonal AlNiFe-phases hosted in a shocked meteorite, different laboratories have undertaken a series of shock recovery experiments to understand their formation mechanism. Shock experiments generate a complex series of processes and conditions, including a near-instantaneous excursion to high pressure and high temperature, large shear stresses, local melting, rapid decompression, fast quenching and post-shock annealing. This highly dynamic scenario offers a very useful but imperfect tool for exploring the stability of novel alloys, such as quasicrystals. So far, all the shock-synthesized quasicrystals differ considerably in composition from any thermodynamically stable or metastable quasicrystals synthesized by metallurgical techniques at low pressure, leaving plenty of questions to be answered about their formation conditions and their nucleation and growth mechanisms occurring during shock experiments. In this Perspective, we summarize the previous studies of shock-synthesized quasicrystals and discuss the advantages and difficulties caused by the experimental complexity. We also propose a few directions for future experiments to better control the shock conditions and understand the properties of quasicrystals.

Identifiers

PMID39390244
PMCPMC11467205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.