ReviewCommunications chemistry2024
Quasicrystal synthesis by shock compression.
Review in Communications chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Forty years of crazy crystals.Nature · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quasicrystals are of interest because of their unique nonperiodic structures and physical properties. Motivated by naturally occurring icosahedral AlCuFe- and decagonal AlNiFe-phases hosted in a shocked meteorite, different laboratories have undertaken a series of shock recovery experiments to understand their formation mechanism. Shock experiments generate a complex series of processes and conditions, including a near-instantaneous excursion to high pressure and high temperature, large shear stresses, local melting, rapid decompression, fast quenching and post-shock annealing. This highly dynamic scenario offers a very useful but imperfect tool for exploring the stability of novel alloys, such as quasicrystals. So far, all the shock-synthesized quasicrystals differ considerably in composition from any thermodynamically stable or metastable quasicrystals synthesized by metallurgical techniques at low pressure, leaving plenty of questions to be answered about their formation conditions and their nucleation and growth mechanisms occurring during shock experiments. In this Perspective, we summarize the previous studies of shock-synthesized quasicrystals and discuss the advantages and difficulties caused by the experimental complexity. We also propose a few directions for future experiments to better control the shock conditions and understand the properties of quasicrystals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.