ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2024
Antibiotics for surgical site infections in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rational utilization of antibiotic prophylaxis in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a large scope review of recent data.BMC oral health · 2025Review
- Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Site Infection After Titanium Plate Removal Following Orthognathic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery of any type, which evaluated surgical site infections (SSI) in either: long-term (at least 2 days) post-surgical antibiotic dosing versus short term (one day) post-surgical dosing for the same drug; or Orthognathic surgery patients administered a post-surgical single-day antibiotic versus a singular pre-operative dosing of any antibiotic in the post-surgical phase. Singe-arm studies, retrospective studies, unpublished data, studies which were not peer-reviewed, editorials and trials not dealing with patients undergoing orthognathic surgery specifically were not included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data for the publication year, primary author name, location of the study, antibiotic type, antibiotic protocol with its type, dosing and timing, sample size, protocol of the control group, male gender, age, diagnosis and rates of SSIs were extracted from the included studies. Pooled rates of SSIs were utilized to produce risk ratio (RR).
resultsA total of eleven RCTs met the inclusion criteria. As per the meta-analysis, post-orthognathic surgery SSI risk was reduced significantly as a result of long-term prophylactic antibiotic usage when compared to short-term utilization. Further, the meta-analysis demonstrated that there was a significant reduction of SSI risk in patients on a single day prophylactic antibiotic regimen in comparison to those on a single preoperative antibiotic dose.
conclusionsThe study observed that long-term (2-7 days) prophylactic antibiotics reduce SSI risk when compared to antibiotic administration over a single day. In turn, it was also found that the latter was of greater benefit over a pre-operative single antibiotic dosage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39390241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.