ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
Robotic availability, not payor status, determines access to robotic emergency general surgery hernia repair in California and Florida.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EHS Guidelines on the Management of Primary Ventral and Incisional Hernias Under Emergency Conditions.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Robotic Surgical Management of Complicated Diverticulitis.Current trauma reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that access to robotic surgery is influenced by socioeconomic factors, including insurance status. The 2010 Affordable Care Act established an avenue for states to expand Medicaid coverage, which has increased access to surgical care for many conditions. We hypothesized that socioeconomic disparities in access to robotic repair of non-elective emergency general surgery (EGS) hernias are less prevalent in California, a Medicaid expansion state, compared to Florida, which has not adopted Medicaid expansion.
methodsThe 2021 California and Florida State Inpatient Databases were used to identify all EGS admissions with an ICD-10 procedure code for ventral or inguinal hernia repair. Elective procedures and those with concurrent unrelated abdominal procedures were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidity burden, payor status, and income quartile were abstracted. Aggregation of hospital data identified high-volume trauma, robotic, and EGS centers.
resultsThere were 15,683 EGS hernia procedures of which 11% underwent robotic repair: 14% in Florida and 8% in California. On multivariable logistic regression, older age, male sex, lower income, and Medicare insurance were associated with reduced odds of robotic hernia repair in California, but not in Florida, despite an uninsured rate of 10%. The greatest predictor of robotic surgery in both states was treatment at a robotic surgery center. Overall, accounting for patient- and hospital-level factors, hernia surgeries in Florida were more likely to involve robotics (OR 1.61, CI 1.42-1.81, p < 0.001) compared to California.
conclusionThere were fewer disparities in access to EGS robotic hernia repairs in Florida than in California. This suggests that robotic surgery access for EGS hernia repairs is primarily determined by institutional adoption of robotic surgery, not income or payor status. Compared to California, Florida appears to have greater market penetration of robotic surgery, which has increased access to robotic EGS for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39390233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.