ArticleScientific reports2024
Accurate and 30-plus days reliable cuffless blood pressure measurements with 9-minutes personal photoplethysmograph data and mixed deduction learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating cross-dataset transfer learning for photoplethysmography-based blood pressure estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving non-invasive glucose estimation with monthly calibrated photoplethysmography and implicit HbA1c.Communications medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurements have long been anticipated, and the PPG (Photoplethysmography)-only method is the most promising one since already embedded in many wearable devices. To further meet the clinical accuracy requirements, PPG-only BP predictions with personalized modeling for overcoming personal deviations have been widely studied, but all required tens to hundreds of minutes of personal PPG measurements for training. Moreover, their accurate test periods without calibration practice were not reported. In this work, we collected records of PPG data from our recruited subjects in real-life scenarios instead of relying on the openly available MIMIC dataset obtained from intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Since our objective is commercial application and a substantial reduction in training data, we tailored our model training to closely mimic real-world usage. To achieve this, we developed a training approach that only requires 9-minutes of personal PPG signal recordings and mixed with other PPG data from our recruited 364 subjects. The modeling is conducted with two-channel paired inputs to the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model, which we called Mixed Deduction Learning (MDL). The test results of 88 samples from 15 subjects, under testing period up to 30-plus days without extra calibration, revealed that MDL meets most of the standards of AAMI, BHS, and IEEE 1708-2014 (for static test only) for BP measurement devices, which indicates MDL's long-term stability and consistency. Furthermore, we found that the model with two-channel inputs presents a trend of improving performance as the pool of mixed training data increased, while the conventional one-channel input revealed degraded performance. The outperformance of MDL is attributed to many significant features remained in the first CNN layer even when mixing personal 9-minutes data with the other 364 subjects. Consequently, PPG-only with MDL introduces a new avenue for overcoming challenges in training due to personal physiological variations. Given our consideration of real-life usage, this technology can be seamlessly translated to commercial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.