ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a machine learning model to identify intraventricular hemorrhage using time-series analysis in preterm infants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From oxidative stress to epigenetic regulation: Molecular mechanisms of preterm brain injury and neuroprotective strategies (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction models for intraventricular hemorrhage in very preterm infants: a systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the prevalence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) has remained high, no optimal strategy has been established to prevent it. This study included preterm newborns born at a gestational age of < 32 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital between January 2013 and June 2022. Infants who had been observed for less than 24 h were excluded. A total of 14 features from time-series data after birth to IVH diagnosis were chosen for model development using an automated machine-learning method. The average F1 scores and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were used as indicators for comparing the models. We analyzed 778 preterm newborns (79 with IVH, 10.2%; 699 with no IVH, 89.8%) with a median gestational age of 29.4 weeks and birth weight of 1180 g. Model development was performed using data from 748 infants after applying the exclusion criteria. The Extra Trees Classifier model showed the best performance with an average F1 score of 0.93 and an AUROC of 0.999. We developed a model for identifying IVH with excellent accuracy. Further research is needed to recognize high-risk infants in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.