Trial reportScientific reports2024
Clinical study on the intervention effect of digital therapy on children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven mechanistic analysis of digital therapeutic-assisted training and evaluation of personalized protocol effects in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Trial
- A Preliminary Study on the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Digital Therapeutic Device: A Randomized Clinical Trial in South Korean Pediatric Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- Eye-Tracking-Based Digital Therapeutic for ADHD in Children: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Adaptive Learning Guide.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cross-training digital therapeutics for pediatric ADHD: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2026Article
- Integrating single-channel EEG neurofeedback into video game-based digital therapeutics for ADHD.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Mitigating Blue-Light Risk in Display-Based Digital Therapeutics: A Practical Framework to Support Clinical Efficacy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From monitoring to intervention: a closed-loop digital health framework for gaming disorder.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Verification of the Effectiveness of a Token Economy Method Through Digital Intervention Content for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pediatric Applications of Digital Therapeutics: Clinical Evidence and Implementation Landscape.Cureus · 2025Review
- Personalized Game-Based Content and Performance: A Pilot Study on a Digital Intervention for Children with ADHD.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Digital twins in healthcare: A systematic review of current applications, frameworks, and future directions.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of digital therapy for children aged 6 to 12 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). From January to March 2023, 52 children aged 6 to 12 years with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) from Wuhan Children's Hospital, Hubei Province, China were selected for intervention using the "MindPro1" attention training software developed by Jiangsu Ruinao Qizhi Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Before the intervention, the children were in a stable treatment state, and no modifications were made to the original treatment plan during the MindPro1 intervention. Subjects with severe mental illness or other conditions that may affect the implementation and evaluation of disease treatment were excluded. Subjects completed the planned 4-week intervention, and changes in attention-related variables were assessed using the Test of Attention Variables (TOVA) and the parent version of the 18-item SNAP-IV scale (Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, version IV scale) before and after the intervention. After 4 weeks of intervention, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the response rate of the 18-item SNAP-IV-Parent scale, which was ≥ 30% improvement from baseline, was higher than 27.5% (better than similar products on the market); the SNAP-IV parent score improved (P < 0.001), with statistical significance; the TOVA-ACS score improved (P < 0.05), with statistical significance. The acceptance rate of parents of children was 100%, and the average compliance rate was 95%. There were 4 cases (7.69%) of adverse reactions that may be related to the device in this trial, which recovered spontaneously within 2 days of discontinuation, and no serious adverse events occurred. After 4 weeks of treatment with ADHD auxiliary treatment software, the objective attention assessment data and attention function assessment scale were significantly improved. Parents had a high acceptance of the software, the average compliance rate of participants was high, and the incidence of related adverse events was low and mild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.