Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39390032›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Domesticating the wild through escapees of two iconic mediterranean farmed fish species.

Kilian Toledo-Guedes, Javier Atalah, David Izquierdo-Gomez, Damián Fernandez-Jover, Ingebrigt Uglem, Pablo Sanchez-Jerez, Pablo Arechavala-Lopez, Tim Dempster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kilian Toledo-GuedesDepartment of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. ktoledo@ua.es.
Javier AtalahDepartment of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
David Izquierdo-GomezThe Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, Nofima, Tromsø, Norway.
Damián Fernandez-JoverDepartment of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Ingebrigt UglemDepartment of Salmonid Fishes, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway.
Pablo Sanchez-JerezDepartment of Marine Sciences and Applied Biology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Pablo Arechavala-LopezDepartment of Marine Ecology, Mediterranean Institute of Advanced Studies (IMEDEA- CSIC/UIB), Esporles, Spain.
Tim DempsterQueenscliff Marine Science Centre, Sustainable Aquaculture Laboratory - Temperate and Tropical (SALTT), Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, 3225, Australia.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación FJCI-2014-20100Agencia Estatal de Investigación IJCI-2015-25595European Maritime and Fisheries Fund GLObal change Resilience in Aquaculture-2 (GLORiA2)European Union NextGeneration EU María ZambranoFundación Biodiversidad GLObal change Resilience in Aquaculture-2 (GLORiA2)Generalitat Valenciana THINKINAZUL/2021/044-TOWARDSMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación THINKINAZUL/2021/044-TOWARDS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extractive fisheries and marine aquaculture share space and target species. Several regional-scale examples exist of escapees entering wild fisheries landings, yet no study has assessed the influence of aquaculture on landings at an ecosystem scale. We examined the effects of farmed fish escapes on fisheries using FAO data and published escape rates for Gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Seabream landings were significantly correlated with the estimated biomass of escaped seabream entering the wild. There was a similar pattern for seabass until 2005, but the overall relationship between landings and escapes was not significant due to the dramatic drop in catches in recent years. We argue that seabass escapees' relatively high mortality, lower capturability, and minor 'leaking' from farms may obscure their influence on landings. Significant positive fisheries regime shifts were detected for both species, matching the onset of aquaculture in the Mediterranean and the period when escapees from aquaculture surpassed landings. Our results suggest that fish escapes of these two iconic species may mask wild stock overexploitation, confound stock assessments, alter genetic diversity, increase the risk of spreading pathogens and parasites, and compete with wild conspecifics while boosting fisheries landings.

Indexed as

AquacultureBassFisheriesSea BreamAnimalsBiomassDomesticationEcosystemMediterranean SeaEscape eventsEuropean seabassFisheries landingsGilthead SeabreamSmall-scale fisheriesStock assessments

Identifiers

PMID39390032
PMCPMC11466952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.