Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39389993›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Multiple objectives optimization of injection-moulding process for dashboard using soft computing and particle swarm optimization.

Mehdi Moayyedian, Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani, Parisa Jourabchi Amirkhizi, Houshyar Asadi, Mohsen Hedayati-Dezfooli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehdi MoayyedianCollege of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Egaila, 54200, Kuwait.
Mohammad Reza Chalak QazaniFaculty of Computing and Information Technology (FoCIT), Sohar University, Sohar, 311, Oman.
Parisa Jourabchi AmirkhiziDesign Faculty, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.
Houshyar AsadiInstitute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Mohsen Hedayati-DezfooliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Arab League St, 24449, Doha, Qatar. mohsen.hedayati@udst.edu.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research focuses on utilizing injection moulding to assess defects in plastic products, including sink marks, shrinkage, and warpages. Process parameters, such as pure cooling time, mould temperature, melt temperature, and pressure holding time, are carefully selected for investigation. A full factorial design of experiments is employed to identify optimal settings. These parameters significantly affect the physical and mechanical properties of the final product. Soft computing methods, such as finite element (FE), help mitigate behaviour by considering different input parameters. A CAD model of a dashboard component integrates into an FE simulation to quantify shrinkage, warpage, and sink marks. Four chosen parameters of the injection moulding machine undergo comprehensive experimental design. Decision tree, multilayer perceptron, long short-term memory, and gated recurrent units models are explored for injection moulding process modelling. The best model estimates defects. Multiple objectives particle swarm optimisation extracts optimal process parameters. The proposed method is implemented in MATLAB, providing 18 optimal solutions based on the extracted Pareto-Front.

Indexed as

Injection mouldingMultiple objectives particle swarm optimisationPareto frontSoft computingWarpage/shrinkage/sink mark

Identifiers

PMID39389993
PMCPMC11467200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.