Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39389990›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

An ontology-based text mining dataset for extraction of process-structure-property entities.

Ali Riza Durmaz, Akhil Thomas, Lokesh Mishra, Rachana Niranjan Murthy, Thomas Straub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali Riza Durmaz *Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79108, Germany. ali.riza.durmaz@iwm.fraunhofer.de.
Akhil Thomas *Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79108, Germany.
Lokesh MishraIBM Research, Rüschlikon, 8803, Switzerland.
Rachana Niranjan MurthyFraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79108, Germany.
Thomas StraubFraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79108, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 13XP5118B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While large language models learn sound statistical representations of the language and information therein, ontologies are symbolic knowledge representations that can complement the former ideally. Research at this critical intersection relies on datasets that intertwine ontologies and text corpora to enable training and comprehensive benchmarking of neurosymbolic models. We present the MaterioMiner dataset and the linked materials mechanics ontology where ontological concepts from the mechanics of materials domain are associated with textual entities within the literature corpus. Another distinctive feature of the dataset is its eminently fine-grained annotation. Specifically, 179 distinct classes are manually annotated by three raters within four publications, amounting to 2191 entities that were annotated and curated. Conceptual work is presented for the symbolic representation of causal composition-process-microstructure-property relationships. We explore the annotation consistency between the three raters and perform fine-tuning of pre-trained language models to showcase the feasibility of training named entity recognition models. Reusing the dataset can foster training and benchmarking of materials language models, automated ontology construction, and knowledge graph generation from textual data.

Identifiers

PMID39389990
PMCPMC11467320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.