ArticleCell death & disease2024
Stage-specific modulation of multinucleation, fusion, and resorption by the long non-coding RNA DLEU1 and miR-16 in human primary osteoclasts.
Article in Cell death & disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphodynamic cellular changes prior to and during cell fusion related to osteoclast formation.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Anti-miR-195-engineered mesenchymal stem cells promote migration, vascularization, and ECM protein expression in vivo.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Tissue Factor-inhibited Beclin1-autophagy via BCL2 overexpression suppresses the differentiation of human monocytes into mature osteoclasts.Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Mechanistic insights into miR-584-5p-mediated Inhibition of PDLSCs osteogenic differentiation through H2AFZ upregulation and RUNX2 suppression.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Non-coding RNA modulation in osteoclasts and its implications for osteoblast lineage cell behavior in a co-culture system.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Transcriptional reprogramming during human osteoclast differentiation identifies regulators of osteoclast activity.Bone research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoclasts are the only cells able to resorb all the constituents of the bone matrix. While the modulation of osteoclast activity is well established for preventing bone-related diseases, there is an increasing demand for novel classes of anti-resorption agents. Herein, we investigated non-coding RNA molecules and proposed DLEU1 and miR-16 as potential candidates for modulating osteoclast functions. DLEU1 and miR-16 target cell fusion at both the early and late stages of osteoclastogenesis but operate through independent pathways. DLEU1 silencing hinders the fusion process, leading to abrogation of the phagocytic cup fusion modality and a reduction in the fusion events between mononucleated precursors and multinucleated osteoclasts, while miR-16 influences monocyte-to-osteoclast differentiation, impairing osteoclasts formation but not the number of nuclei at early stages. On the other hand, using these non-coding RNAs to engineer mature osteoclasts has implications for bone resorption. Both DLEU1 and miR-16 influence the speed of resorption in pit-forming osteoclasts, without affecting the resorbed area. However, the impact of increasing miR-16 levels extends more broadly, affecting trench-forming osteoclasts as well, leading to a reduction in their percentage, speed, and resorbed area. These findings offer potential new therapeutic targets to ameliorate bone destruction in skeletal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.