Trial reportGastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Impact of difficult biliary cannulation on post-ERCP pancreatitis: secondary analysis of the stent versus indomethacin trial dataset.
Trial report in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07117318 (Rectal Non-steroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs With or Without Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rectal Non-steroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs With or Without Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: a Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Rectal Diclofenac Versus Indomethacin in Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction model for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Confounding by Indication in Real-World Indomethacin Use for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Implications for Severity and Cost.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Fatty Pancreas and the Association Between Pancreatic Manipulation Burden and Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Difficult biliary cannulation among patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: predictors and impact on complications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous vs precut for difficult biliary cannulation: Updated meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP: techniques and an evidence-informed practical algorithm.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Transpancreatic Sphincterotomy Is a Safe and Effective Pancreatic Guidewire-Assisted Cannulation Method: Real-World Data Analysis of the Hungarian ERCP Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Early precut is useful for difficult bile duct cannulation, particularly in cases with long oral protrusion.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of prophylactic pancreatic stents in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a 16-year comprehensive study.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsDifficult biliary cannulation (DBC) is a known risk factor for developing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). To better understand how DBC increases PEP risk, we examined the interplay between technical aspects of DBC and known PEP risk factors.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing rectal indomethacin alone with the combination of rectal indomethacin and prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent placement for PEP prophylaxis in high-risk patients. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: DBC with high preprocedure risk for PEP, DBC without high preprocedure risk for PEP, and non-DBC at high preprocedure risk for PEP.
resultsIn all, 1601 participants (84.1%) experienced DBC, which required a mean of 12 cannulation attempts (standard deviation, 10) and mean duration of 14.7 minutes (standard deviation, 14.9). PEP rate was highest (20.7%) in DBC with a high preprocedure risk, followed by non-DBC with a high preprocedure risk (13.5%), and then DBC without a high preprocedure risk (8.8%). Increasing number of PD wire passages (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.1) was associated with PEP in DBC, but PD injection, pancreatic sphincterotomy, and number of cannulation attempts were not associated with PEP. Combining indomethacin with PD stent placement lowered the risk of PEP (aOR, .61; 95% CI, .44-.84) in DBCs. This protective effect was evident in up to at least 4 PD wire passages.
conclusionsDBC confers higher PEP risk in an additive fashion to preprocedural risk factors. PD wire passages appear to add the greatest PEP risk in DBCs, but combining indomethacin with PD stent placement reduces this risk, even with increasing PD wire passages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.