Trial reportESMO open2024
Leptin as a surrogate immune-metabolic marker to predict impact of anti-cachectic therapy: results of a prospective randomized trial in multiple solid tumors.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Circulating Muscle Markers for Sarcopenia in Peritoneal Dialysis.International journal of nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
description of the workLeptin is a reliable predictive and surrogate marker of the efficacy of multitargeted treatment of cancer cachexia. PURPOSE: To the best of our knowledge, no study has assessed the predictive role of biomarkers in establishing the effectiveness of anti-cachectic treatment, which remains a complex issue. Herein, we aimed to find a marker that can detect early response to anti-cachectic treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsFrom January 2012 to December 2022, all consecutive eligible advanced cancer patients with cachexia were prospectively enrolled in an exploratory and validation cohort according to eligibility criteria. All patients received a combined anti-cachectic treatment consisting of megestrol acetate plus celecoxib plus l-carnitine plus antioxidants that showed efficacy in a previous phase III randomized study. Primary endpoints were an increase in lean body mass (LBM), a decrease in resting energy expenditure (REE), a decrease in fatigue, and improvement in global quality of life.
resultsA total of 553 consecutive patients were recruited. Twenty patients dropped out, equally distributed over the exploratory (11 patients) and validation (9 patients) cohorts, for early death due to disease progression. Then, 533 patients were deemed assessable. Leptin level changes inversely correlated with circulating levels of inflammatory mediators and reflected the improvement of body composition, energy metabolism, functional performance, and quality of life. At multivariate regression analysis, at week 8, leptin change was an independent predictor of LBM, skeletal muscle index (SMI), grip strength increase, and REE; at week 16, leptin change was an independent predictor of the same parameters and improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The ability of leptin to predict changes in LBM, SMI, REE, and grip strength was superior to that of other inflammatory markers when comparing the receiver operating curves. Moreover, increasing delta leptin values were associated with significantly better outcomes in LBM, SMI, REE, grip strength, and fatigue.
conclusionsLeptin is a reliable predictive marker for multitargeted anti-cachectic treatment outcomes. Thus, it can be an ideal candidate for monitoring and predicting the effects of anti-cachectic treatment and a surrogate marker of the immune-metabolic actions of the selected drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.