Observational studyJournal of global health2024
Impact of exacerbation history on future risk and treatment outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A prospective cohort study based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A and B classifications.
Observational study in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate and Severe Exacerbations and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Chinese Patients with COPD on Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Database Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease predicts 6-month readmission in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: development and validation of a nomogram.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- GOLD 2026 COPD ABE assessment tool to identify individuals at high risk in a UK multicentre COPD cohort (ERICA).BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of the Eosinophil-to-Neutrophil Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Chonnam medical journal · 2026Article
- Airway mucus plugs in COPD clinical phenotypes and prognosis across stable and exacerbation states.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mobile health for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a bibliometric analysis based on integrated databases (2000-2025).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Disease Burden and Unmet Needs in Chinese Patients with Symptomatic and Exacerbating COPD While on Triple Inhaled Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Real-World Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Progression from GOLD A/B to GOLD E: a claims analysis of patients with COPD newly initiating inhaled therapy.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Observational
- Prognostic risk profiling in COPD using Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 ABE and comorbidity assessment: evidence from a register-based COPD cohort.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aimed to explore the impact of exacerbation history on future exacerbation and mortality with different inhaled drugs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients based on a Global Initiative Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A and B classifications. Methods: This observational study was based on the cohort study Real World Research of Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD (RealDTC). We collected data from COPD patients in China from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2022. Patients were followed up until December 2023 or death. Further, we separated GOLD A and B patients into GOLD A0 and B0, who had no exacerbation during the previous year, and GOLD A1 and B1, who had only one exacerbation during the previous year. Study outcomes included moderate-to-severe exacerbation, hospitalisation, frequent exacerbation in the first year and all-cause mortality during total follow-up. Results: Of the 8318 eligible patients, GOLD E group of patients suffered from a greater risk of exacerbation in the first year and death than patients in the GOLD A and B groups. GOLD A1 group had a higher risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.087; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.419-3.068), hospitalisation (HR = 1.704; 95% CI = 1.010-2.705) and frequent exacerbation (HR = 1.983; 95% CI = 1.046-3.709) compared to GOLD A0. GOLD B1 group had a risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation (HR = 1.321; 95% CI = 1.105-1.679) and mortality (HR = 1.362; 95% CI = 1.026-1.963) that exceeded the risk in GOLD B0 group. The treatment outcome of different inhaled drugs had no statistical differences in GOLD A0 group. In GOLD A1 group, only inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), in addition to long-acting β-2 agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), reduced the risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation in the first year compared to only LAMA. As for the GOLD B0 group, LABA and LAMA decreased the odds of moderate-to-severe exacerbation, hospitalisation, frequent exacerbation and mortality compared to only LAMA. ICS, LABA, and LAMA in GOLD B0 also down-regulated the risk of frequent exacerbation, compared to only LAMA. In addition, GOLD B1 patients treated with LABA and LAMA or ICS, LABA, and LAMA had a lower risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbation and hospitalisation. Meanwhile, ICS, LABA, and LAMA also reduced the risk of frequent exacerbation and mortality, compared to only LAMA in the multivariate Cox analysis. Conclusions: Compared to the GOLD A or B group without exacerbation history, GOLD A patients with exacerbation history had a higher risk of future exacerbation, and GOLD B patients with exacerbation history had a higher risk of future exacerbation and mortality and benefited more from triple inhaler therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.