SynthesisJournal of global health2024
Management cost of acute respiratory infections in older adults in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term sero-epidemiological trends of Nine respiratory pathogens in a predominantly pediatric population in Southwest China: a multicenter retrospective study (2019-2023).BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Long-term trends of influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory infection across pandemic phases: an interrupted time-series study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Direct medical costs of respiratory infections in adults: A multicenter retrospective analysis in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam.PloS one · 2026Article
- Incidence and costs of hospitalisation due to acute respiratory infection in adults aged over 50 years in Jiangsu, China in 2019-23: a real-world medical database analysis of 0.2 million episodes.Journal of global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory infection (ARI) poses a significant public health challenge worldwide, particularly among older adults. Understanding the cost of ARI management is important for optimising intervention strategy. We aimed to estimate the management cost of ARI in older adults in China. Methods: We searched three English databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science) and four Chinese databases (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, SinoMed, and VIP) to identify studies published between 1 January 1995 and 27 February 2023 on the cost of ARI management in older adults in China. We pooled up age group and category-specific costs across individual studies by calculating median and interquartile range (IQR). All cost results were converted and inflated to USD in 2021. Results: We included 99 studies, of which 50 were determined as high quality. In those aged >60 years, the median total cost of ARI, including direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect cost, was USD 3263 (IQR = 2676-3786) in the inpatient setting and USD 104 (IQR = 80-129) in the outpatient setting. For both inpatient and outpatient settings, direct medical costs accounted for most of the costs (69.3% and 54.8%, respectively). There was an increasing trend over age in the median direct medical cost in the inpatient setting, ranging from USD 1517 (IQR = 1114-2017) in those aged ≥50 years to USD 3493 (IQR = 2608-4378) in those aged ≥80 years. Conclusions: Our study fills the knowledge gap on the cost of ARI and suggests that the overall cost of ARI is substantial among older adults in China. Cost data stratified by region, pathogen, and presence of comorbidities are warranted to help further identify subpopulations with higher ARI management costs. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023485669.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.