ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024
Solid-State High Harmonic Generation in Common Large Bandgap Substrate Materials.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Isostructural electronic transition in MoSScience advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid-state high harmonic generation (sHHG) spectroscopy is an emerging ultrafast technique for studying key material properties such as electronic structure at and away from equilibrium. sHHG anisotropy measurements, where sHHG spectra are recorded depending on the driving electric field relative to the crystal lattice, have become a powerful tool for studying crystal symmetries. Previous works on two-dimensional materials and other quantum materials have often used substrate-supported samples, assuming that all sHHG signals originate from the sample due to the relatively large bandgap of the substrate. While this assumption is generally reasonable, we show that some sHHG emissions from commonly used substrates can occur at moderate intensities of the sHHG driving field. In addition, we show that it is essential to consider not only the sHHG yield from a substrate but also its angular dependence relative to the material of interest. Specifically, in this work, the power-dependent and polarization angle-resolved sHHG emissions of fused silica, calcium fluoride, diamond, and sapphire of two different crystalline qualities and orientations are compared using a mid-infrared (MIR) driving field. This empirical characterization aims to guide the substrate selection for sHHG studies of novel materials to minimize the misattribution and interference of substrate-related sHHG emissions, which opens the possibility to study a wider array of materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.