Trial reportAnesthesiology2025
Protamine Dosing for Heparin Reversal after Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Two Strategies.
Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The protamine-to-heparin ratio: concept and clinical application.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026Article
- Protamine dosing in cardiac surgery: method is key.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Contemporary Clinical Practices in Anticoagulation Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Europe-Wide Survey.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrug shortages are a frequent challenge in current clinical practice. Certain drugs (e.g., protamine) lack alternatives, and inadequate supplies can limit access to services. Conventional protamine dosing uses heparin ratio-based calculations for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass and may result in excess protamine utilization and potential harm due to its intrinsic anticoagulation. This study hypothesized that a fixed 250-mg protamine dose would be comparable, as measured by the activated clotting time, to a 1:1 (1 mg for every 100 U) protamine-to-heparin ratio-based strategy for heparin reversal and that protamine would be conserved.
methodsIn a single-center, double-blinded trial, consenting elective adult cardiac surgical patients without preexisting coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulation and a calculated initial heparin dose greater than or equal to 27,500 U were randomized to receive, after cardiopulmonary bypass, protamine as a fixed dose (250 mg) or a ratio-based dose (1 mg:100 U heparin). The primary outcome was the activated clotting time after initial protamine administration, assessed by Student's t test. Secondary outcomes included total protamine, the need for additional protamine, and the cumulative 24-h chest tube output.
resultsThere were 62 and 63 patients in the fixed- and ratio-based dose groups, respectively. The mean postprotamine activated clotting time was not different between groups (-2.0 s; 95% CI, -7.2 to 3.3 s; P = 0.47). Less total protamine per case was administered in the fixed-dose group (-2.1 50-mg vials; 95% CI, -2.4 to -1.8; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the cumulative 24-h chest tube output (difference, -77 ml; 95% CI, 220 to 65 ml; P = 0.28).
conclusionsA 1:1 heparin ratio-based protamine dosing strategy compared to a fixed 250-mg dose resulted in the administration of a larger total dose of protamine but no difference in either the initial activated clotting time or the amount postoperative chest-tube bleeding. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:
Indexed as
Identifiers
39388600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.