Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39388477›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Compression-based inference of network motif sets.

Alexis Bénichou, Jean-Baptiste Masson, Christian L Vestergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis BénichouInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-9286
Jean-Baptiste MassonInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5484-9056
Christian L VestergaardInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-475X

Funding

L’Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-P3IA-0001L’Agence Nationale de la Recherche SINCOBE, ANR-20-CE45-0021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical and functional constraints on biological networks lead to complex topological patterns across multiple scales in their organization. A particular type of higher-order network feature that has received considerable interest is network motifs, defined as statistically regular subgraphs. These may implement fundamental logical and computational circuits and are referred to as "building blocks of complex networks". Their well-defined structures and small sizes also enable the testing of their functions in synthetic and natural biological experiments. Here, we develop a framework for motif mining based on lossless network compression using subgraph contractions. This provides an alternative definition of motif significance which allows us to compare different motifs and select the collectively most significant set of motifs as well as other prominent network features in terms of their combined compression of the network. Our approach inherently accounts for multiple testing and correlations between subgraphs and does not rely on a priori specification of an appropriate null model. It thus overcomes common problems in hypothesis testing-based motif analysis and guarantees robust statistical inference. We validate our methodology on numerical data and then apply it on synaptic-resolution biological neural networks, as a medium for comparative connectomics, by evaluating their respective compressibility and characterize their inferred circuit motifs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyData CompressionHumansNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID39388477
PMCPMC11495616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.