ArticlePloS one2024
Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in cervical cancer: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis paper reports a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol that will be used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, alone or combined with bevacizumab and other therapies, in adult women with cervical carcinoma from stage IB2 onwards.
methodsThe protocol follows PRISMA-P recommendations and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024531233). The search will be conducted without restrictions on language and year of publication in the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cancerlit, The World Health Organization (WHO), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Grey literature will be searched using the following sources: Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar and Opengrey. Manual search will be carried out for the reference lists of eligible studies. The studies will be selected independently by two reviewers and all completed or ongoing randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, used alone or combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, bevacizumab or surgery, in adult women diagnosed with cervical cancer, will be included. The data extraction will include population characteristics, type of treatment and main outcomes of studies. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. The certainty of the evidence will be rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).
conclusionsThe findings will be presented in narrative summary tables and a quantitative synthesis will be conducted using the 'meta' package of R software, version 4.3.1. This future systematic review may contribute with quality evidence for clinical decision-making on the use of pembrolizumab in women with cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.