ArticlePloS one2024
A search for bacteria identified from cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections in previous surgical events.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shunt infections are a common complication when treating hydrocephalus by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt placement. The source of infecting pathogens is not well understood. One hypothesis, which we explored here, is that microorganisms persist chronically in the host long before a symptomatic infection occurs and may be detectable in surgical events preceding infection. A cohort of 13 patients was selected, for which CSF samples were available from an infection episode and from a previous surgery event, which was either an initial shunt placement or a revision. Microbiota were analyzed both directly from CSF and from isolates cultured from CSF on aerobic and anaerobic media. The detection and identification of bacteria was done with high throughput DNA sequencing methods and mass spectrometry. The presence of bacteria was confirmed in 4 infection samples, of which 2 were after initial placement and 2 after revision surgery. Taxonomic identification was consistent with clinical microbiology laboratory results. Bacteria were not detected in any of the CSF samples collected at the time of the previous surgical events. While our findings do not provide direct evidence for long-term persistence of pathogens, they suggest the need for consideration of additional source material, such as biofilm and environmental swabs, and/or the use of more sensitive and specific analytical methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.