Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39388221›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Sensory-memory interactions via modular structure explain errors in visual working memory.

Jun Yang, Hanqi Zhang, Sukbin Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun YangWeiyang College, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-2494
Hanqi ZhangShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning, Shanghai, China.
Sukbin LimShanghai Frontiers Science Center of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-5293

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2021ZD0203705Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China STI2030-Major Projects No.2021ZD0203700NYU Shanghai Summer Undergraduate Research Program (SURP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Errors in stimulus estimation reveal how stimulus representation changes during cognitive processes. Repulsive bias and minimum variance observed near cardinal axes are well-known error patterns typically associated with visual orientation perception. Recent experiments suggest that these errors continuously evolve during working memory, posing a challenge that neither static sensory models nor traditional memory models can address. Here, we demonstrate that these evolving errors, maintaining characteristic shapes, require network interaction between two distinct modules. Each module fulfills efficient sensory encoding and memory maintenance, which cannot be achieved simultaneously in a single-module network. The sensory module exhibits heterogeneous tuning with strong inhibitory modulation reflecting natural orientation statistics. While the memory module, operating alone, supports homogeneous representation via continuous attractor dynamics, the fully connected network forms discrete attractors with moderate drift speed and nonuniform diffusion processes. Together, our work underscores the significance of sensory-memory interaction in continuously shaping stimulus representation during working memory.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermVisual PerceptionHumansModels, Neurologicalattractor dynamicsefficient codinghumanneurosciencesensory perceptionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39388221
PMCPMC11466453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.