ArticleJournal of health care chaplaincy
Proof of concept, feasibility, and acceptability of spiritual care assessment and intervention-pediatric with caregivers of children receiving home mechanical ventilation.
Article in Journal of health care chaplaincy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Caregivers of children with medical complexity face daily tasks comparable to pediatric critical care nursing with multiple stressors. This may result in emotional and spiritual distress. Caregivers may also rely on their religion and spirituality to cope. Chaplains have the potential to support caregivers in this setting, beginning with spiritual assessment. This study's purpose was to verify the feasibility and acceptability of the Spiritual Care Assessment and Intervention framework adapted for home-based chaplaincy with caregivers of children receiving home mechanical ventilation (SCAI-Peds). A quasi-experimental, proof-of-concept trial with N = 6 caregivers and two board certified chaplains was carried out. SCAI-Peds was acceptable and feasible to caregivers, delivered with high fidelity, and was also acceptable to the chaplains. Home-based intervention delivery may provide more room for reflection and reframing than acute care settings. The results warrant advancing SCAI-Peds beyond the pilot stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.