ArticleJAMA oncology2024
Ninth Version of the AJCC and UICC Nasopharyngeal Cancer TNM Staging Classification.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial Comparing Reduced-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Radiotherapy Based on Treatment Response in Early-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Validation and Analysis of the 9th Edition AJCC/UICC Staging System for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Non-High-Incidence Areas in China - A Multicentre Retrospective Clinical Study
Individualized Versus Standard Neck Prophylactic Irradiation in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Non-inferiority, Phase III, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multicentre Phase II Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Recurrent/Metastatic Platinum-Resistant Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Standard chemoradiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant camrelizumab in patients with high risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma: multicentre, randomised, open label, phase 3 trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Trial
- Validation and refinement of the N classification for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 9th version AJCC/UICC TNM staging system in non-endemic regions of China: a multicenter cohort study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Article
- The current role of immunotherapy in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- The 9th Edition of the UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours: Updates and Rationale for Change.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Article
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, signaling pathways, clinical features, diagnosis, and management.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Surveillance Strategies for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Prognostic Analysis of Patients With N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Different Lymph Node Characteristics.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026Article
- Validation of the 9th Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Non-Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis From High-Incidence Regions.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Agreement in Staging and Treatment Recommendations Among Clinicians, Text-Only Clinicians, DeepSeek-V3, and ChatGPT-4o for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Threshold Validity of N3 Criteria in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Narrative Methodological Review of Pragmatic Cutoffs and Biologically Defensible Risk Boundaries.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Upper Versus Middle-Neck Involvement in TNM-9 Stage IB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Implications for De-Escalation and Intensification Strategies.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Staging of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Cranial Nerve Invasion in T4-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study With a Median Follow-Up of 136 Months.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Observational
- Risk Stratification in T4 or N3 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Clinical-radiopathological features and EBV DNA dynamics in nasopharyngeal neuroendocrine carcinoma: implications for prognosis and surveillance.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk stratification of advanced extranodal extension in retropharyngeal lymph nodes for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multi-center study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Accurate staging is a fundamental step in treating patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) worldwide; this is crucial not only for prognostication, but also for guiding treatment decisions. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system is the global language for clinicians, researchers, and cancer registries. Continual improvement that aligns with contemporary pattern of care is essential. Objective: To improve the prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability of the eighth edition (TNM-8) for NPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter study analyzed patients with NPC with detailed tumor features during January 2014 and December 2015 and was reviewed by experienced radiologists. The data analysis was completed in December 2023. The findings were further confirmed with internal and external validation. Statistical analyses and clinical considerations were reviewed by the AJCC/UICC multidisciplinary head and neck panels and attained consensus. The recommendations were evaluated by the AJCC Evidence-Based Medicine Committee before final endorsement as the ninth version (TNM-9). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival. Adjusted hazard ratios of different subgroups were then assessed for confirmation of optimal stage grouping. Results: Of the 4914 patients analyzed, 1264 (25.7%) were female and 3650 (74.3%) were male; the median (SD) age was 48.1 (12.0) years. Advanced radiological extranodal extension (with involvement of adjacent muscles, skin, and/or neurovascular bundles) was identified as an independent adverse factor for all end points: this was added as a criterion for N3. Patients with nonmetastatic disease were regrouped into stages I to III instead of TNM-8 stages I to IVA. Significant hazard discrimination was achieved by grouping T1-2N0-1 as stage I, T3/N2 as stage II, and T4/N3 as stage III. Although the T1-2N0-1 subgroups had comparable 5-year overall survival, subdivisions into IA (T1-T2N0) and IB (T1-T2N1) were recommended due to the distinction in adjusted hazard ratios following adjustment for chemotherapy use. Metastatic disease was exclusively classified as stage IV, and prognostication was further refined by subdivision into IVA (M1a, ≤3 lesions) and IVB (M1b, >3 lesions). TNM-9 demonstrated superiority compared with TNM-8 in major statistical aspects. Conclusion and Relevance: The results of this diagnostic study suggest that the ninth version of TNM staging for NPC, based on robust analyses and a comprehensive review by the AJCC/UICC staging committees, provides an improved staging system for global application and a framework for future incorporation of nonanatomical factors. This will be launched for global application in January 2025.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.