ArticleJAMA network open2024
Macronutrient and Micronutrient Intake Among US Women Aged 20 to 44 Years.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diet Diversity Is Associated with Prepregnancy Body Mass Index but Not the Pregnancy Third-Trimester Gut Microbiota.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for personalized multiple micronutrient supplementation in maternal health.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans in Pregnancy: Adherence Shortfalls and Associations with Gestational Weight Gain.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- The Role of Diet in Women of Childbearing Age: Current Evidence Supporting Nutritional Recommendations.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Associations of prenatal per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances with whole blood folate levels in pregnant women in the Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment (HOME) Study.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Nutritional status before and during pregnancy is important for maternal health and fetal growth and development. Objective: To describe secular trends in nutrient intake from foods, beverages, and supplements among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a secondary series of cross-sectional analyses of the 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Pregnant (n = 1392) and nonpregnant (n = 9737) women aged 20 to 44 years who provided at least 1 reliable dietary recall were included for analysis. These analyses were performed between February 2022 and July 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes included the mean usual intake of macronutrients and micronutrients, as well as the prevalence of inadequate intake of micronutrients. Results: This representative sample included 1392 pregnant women (mean [SE] age, 28.5 [0.3] years) and 9737 nonpregnant women (mean [SE] age, 32.2 [0.1] years). Among pregnant women, a weighted mean (SE) of 27.0% (1.8%) of women were in their first trimester, and 33.8% (2.2%) were in their second trimester. Mean (SE) carbohydrate intake decreased between 1999-2000 and 2013-2018 among pregnant women (306.9 [7.6] to 274.9 [5.7] g/d; β = -2.1 [0.4]; P < .001) and between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018 among nonpregnant women (251.9 [4.9] to 216.9 [3.3] g/d; β = -1.9 [0.4]; P = .002). Between 1999-2000 and 2013-2018, the proportion of pregnant women who consumed below the Estimated Average Requirement of vitamin A increased by 10.9 percentage points (pp) (95% CI, 5.2-16.7 pp), and the proportion of pregnant women who consumed below the Estimated Average Requirement of vitamin C increased by 8.9 pp (95% CI, 3.9-14.0 pp). Similarly, the proportion of nonpregnant women with inadequate intake of vitamin A, vitamin C, and iron increased by 19.9 pp (95% CI, 12.3-27.5 pp), 11.1 pp (95% CI, 4.5-17.7 pp), and 4.9 pp (95% CI, 1.7-8.2 pp), respectively, between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018. The mean (SE) calcium intake increased from 1120.6 (41.4) to 1308.7 (49.0) mg/d for pregnant women (β = 11.7 [4.3]; P = .03) and from 849.5 (19.8) to 981.2 (27.9) mg/d for nonpregnant women (β = 6.7 [2.6]; P = .03; β2 = -1.3 [0.2]; P < .001). Among pregnant women, the prevalence of inadequate intake decreased by 16.1 pp (95% CI, 8.3-23.9 pp) for magnesium (P < .001) and 33.2 pp (95% CI, 24.0-42.4 pp) for vitamin K (P < .001); among nonpregnant women, the proportion with inadequate intake decreased by 16.1 pp (95% CI, 10.4-21.7 pp) for calcium (P < .001), 15.5 pp (95% CI, 7.3-23.6 pp) for magnesium (P < .001), and 33.3 pp (23.5-43.0 pp) for vitamin K (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age found that vitamin A, vitamin C, and iron intake decreased over the past 2 decades, which may have substantial maternal and fetal health implications. By identifying these nutrient gaps and trends in inadequate intake in this at-risk population, scientific, health care, and regulatory communities may be better poised to adopt recommendations to improve nutrient intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.