ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025
Biological Scaffolds in 3D Cell Models: Driving Innovation in Drug Discovery.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering high-fidelity bone organoids: Operational classification, multilineage crosstalk, biofabrication evidence, and translational validation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Conductive biological materials for in vitro models: properties and sustainability implications.In vitro models · 2025Article
- Setup of an In Vitro Three-Dimensional Stromalized Prostate Cancer Model Using Gelatin Microparticles.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discipline of 3D cell modeling is currently undergoing a surge of captivating developments that are enhancing the realism and utility of tissue simulations. Using bioinks which represent cells, scaffolds, and growth factors scientists can construct intricate tissue architectures layer by layer using innovations like 3D bioprinting. Drug testing can be accelerated and organ functions more precisely replicated owing to the precise control that microfluidic technologies and organ-on-chip devices offer over the cellular environment. Tissue engineering is becoming more dynamic with materials that can modify their surroundings with the advent of hydrogels and smart biomaterials. Advances in spheroids and organoids are not only bringing us towards more effective and customized therapies, but they are also improving their ability to resemble actual human tissues. Confocal and two-photon microscopy are examples of advanced imaging methods that provide precise images of the functioning and interaction of cells. Artificial Intelligence models have applications for enhanced scaffold designs and for predicting the response of tissues to medications. Furthermore, via strengthening predictive models, optimizing data analysis, and simplifying 3D cell culture design, artificial intelligence is revolutionizing this field. When combined, these technologies are improving our ability to conduct research and moving us toward more individualized and effective medical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39388081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.