ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Generation of a virtual cohort of TAVI patients for in silico trials: a statistical shape and machine learning analysis.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Regulatory Adoption of AI, ML, Computational Modeling & Simulation in In-Silico Clinical Trials for Medical Devices: A Systematic Review.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Pooled it
- Morphological Variation in the Human Mitral Valve Using Statistical Shape Modelling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- TAVI-TEC: an AI-based tool for procedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Synthetic artificial intelligence in cardiology: from generative models to clinical applications.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Understanding the mechanisms of TAVI durability through computational modelling: a multidisciplinary review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac electrophysiology encoding geometric variability.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review of the Literature.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Virtual Therapy Planning of Aortic Valve Replacement for Preventing Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn silico trials using computational modeling and simulations can complement clinical trials to improve the time-to-market of complex cardiovascular devices in humans. This study aims to investigate the significance of synthetic data in developing in silico trials for assessing the safety and efficacy of cardiovascular devices, focusing on bioprostheses designed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
methodsA statistical shape model (SSM) was employed to extract uncorrelated shape features from TAVI patients, enabling the augmentation of the original patient population into a clinically validated synthetic cohort. Machine learning techniques were utilized not only for risk stratification and classification but also for predicting the physiological variability within the original patient population.
resultsBy randomly varying the statistical shape modes within a range of ± 2σ, a hundred virtual patients were generated, forming the synthetic cohort. Validation against the original patient population was conducted using morphological measurements. Support vector machine regression, based on selected shape modes (principal component scores), effectively predicted the peak pressure gradient across the stenosis (R-squared of 0.551 and RMSE of 11.67 mmHg). Multilayer perceptron neural network accurately predicted the optimal device size for implantation with high sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.98).
conclusionThe study highlights the potential of integrating computational predictions, advanced machine learning techniques, and synthetic data generation to improve predictive accuracy and assess TAVI-related outcomes through in silico trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.