Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39388030›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025

Generation of a virtual cohort of TAVI patients for in silico trials: a statistical shape and machine learning analysis.

Roberta Scuoppo, Salvatore Castelbuono, Stefano Cannata, Giovanni Gentile, Valentina Agnese, Diego Bellavia, Caterina Gandolfo, Salvatore Pasta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Full-field surrogate modeling of cardiac electrophysiology encoding geometric variability.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberta ScuoppoDepartment of Engineering, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed.8, Palermo, Italy.
Salvatore CastelbuonoDepartment of Research, IRCCS ISMETT, via Tricomi, 5, Palermo, Italy.
Stefano CannataInterventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS ISMETT, via Tricomi, 5, Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni GentileRadiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS ISMETT, Via Tricomi, 5, Palermo, Italy.
Valentina AgneseDepartment of Research, IRCCS ISMETT, via Tricomi, 5, Palermo, Italy.
Diego BellaviaDepartment of Research, IRCCS ISMETT, via Tricomi, 5, Palermo, Italy.
Caterina GandolfoInterventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS ISMETT, via Tricomi, 5, Palermo, Italy.
Salvatore PastaDepartment of Engineering, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed.8, Palermo, Italy. salvatore.pasta@unipa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4841-2560

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101017523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn silico trials using computational modeling and simulations can complement clinical trials to improve the time-to-market of complex cardiovascular devices in humans. This study aims to investigate the significance of synthetic data in developing in silico trials for assessing the safety and efficacy of cardiovascular devices, focusing on bioprostheses designed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

methodsA statistical shape model (SSM) was employed to extract uncorrelated shape features from TAVI patients, enabling the augmentation of the original patient population into a clinically validated synthetic cohort. Machine learning techniques were utilized not only for risk stratification and classification but also for predicting the physiological variability within the original patient population.

resultsBy randomly varying the statistical shape modes within a range of ± 2σ, a hundred virtual patients were generated, forming the synthetic cohort. Validation against the original patient population was conducted using morphological measurements. Support vector machine regression, based on selected shape modes (principal component scores), effectively predicted the peak pressure gradient across the stenosis (R-squared of 0.551 and RMSE of 11.67 mmHg). Multilayer perceptron neural network accurately predicted the optimal device size for implantation with high sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.98).

conclusionThe study highlights the potential of integrating computational predictions, advanced machine learning techniques, and synthetic data generation to improve predictive accuracy and assess TAVI-related outcomes through in silico trials.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMachine LearningTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCohort StudiesFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMaleModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerMachine learningStatistical shape analysisTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID39388030
PMCPMC11750893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.