ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing reoperation with solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas and malignant progression of tumors.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and malignant progression of tumors in patients who underwent reoperation for recurrent solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) and hemangiopericytomas (HPCs).
methodsWe identified 48 patients who underwent reoperation because of tumor recurrence at Tangdu Hospital between January 2010 and December 2021 and analyzed the clinical outcomes, namely, the rate of gross total resection (GTR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), malignant progression of tumors and radiotherapy. The survival curves for each group were plotted using the Kaplan‒Meier method and compared using log-rank tests.
resultsOf the 48 patients (25 men and 23 women, mean age 49.5 ± 14.3 years), 25 experienced a second recurrence or metastasis, 15 of whom underwent a third surgery, and the remaining 10 patients who did not undergo surgery ultimately died after tumor progression. The median time (95% CI) to tumor recurrence was 40.0 (32.3-47.7) months after reoperation, with 3-, 5- and 10-year PFS rates of 54.6%, 29.5% and 14.8%, respectively. The median (95% CI) survival time was 70.0 (46.6-93.4) months, with 3-, 5- and 10-year survival rates of 67.9%, 55.1% and 36.7%, respectively. Among the 48 patients who underwent reoperation, 27 (56.3%) achieved GTR, and 21 (43.8%) achieved STR. Twelve patients in the GTR group (12/27, 44.4%) received radiotherapy after surgery, and 18 patients in the STR group (18/21, 85.7%) received radiotherapy. Of the 48 recurrent SFTs, 24 were classified as WHO grade 1, 14 were classified as WHO grade 2, and 10 were classified as WHO grade 3 based on 2021 WHO classification after the primary operation. After reoperation, 9 tumors developed malignant progression, including 4 WHO grade 1 tumors progressing to WHO grade 2 tumors, 1 WHO grade 1 tumor progressing to a WHO grade 3 tumor and 4 WHO grade 2 tumors progressing to WHO grade 3 tumors.
conclusionsGTR after reoperation was associated with better PFS and OS compared to STR. However, the PFS after the third surgery was significantly shorter than that after the second surgery, and the rate of GTR also decreased. Malignant progression may occur after second or third tumor recurrence. Furthermore, compared with WHO grade 1 SFTs, WHO grade 2 and grade 3 SFTs significantly decreased PFS, but OS did not differ among the three groups. Radiotherapy did not prolong PFS or OS in patients who underwent reoperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39387992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.