Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387989›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2024

COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendations for Immunocompromised Patient Populations: Delphi Panel and Consensus Statement Generation in the United States.

Kira Zhi Hua Lai, Stuart Greenstein, Rajesh Govindasamy, Jaya Paranilam, Joseph Brown, Samantha Kimball-Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Is early combination therapy associated with lower risk of respiratory failure in severely immunocompromised hosts with COVID-19? a target trial emulation study from the omicron-dominant era.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kira Zhi Hua LaiICON Clinical Research, Dublin 18, Ireland.
Stuart GreensteinWestchester Medical Center, Transplant Surgery, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
Rajesh GovindasamyUPMC Hamot Medical Center, Erie, PA, 16550, USA.
Jaya ParanilamICON Clinical Research, Dublin 18, Ireland.
Joseph BrownICON Clinical Research, Dublin 18, Ireland.
Samantha Kimball-CarrollICON Clinical Research, Dublin 18, Ireland. Samantha.kimball@iconplc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4229-695X

Funding

Moderna 7700053394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommend COVID-19 vaccines for all immunocompromised individuals. Certain disease groups are at increased risk of comorbidity and death for which disease-specific recommendations should be considered. The objective of the Delphi panel of experts was to summarize expert consensus on COVID-19 vaccinations for patients with rheumatologic disease, renal disease, hematologic malignancy and solid organ transplant (SOT) in the US.

methodsA two-stage Delphi panel method was employed, starting with qualitative interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs) in the four disease areas (n = 4 KOLs, n = 16 total) followed by three rounds of iterative revision of disease-specific COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. Final consensus was rated after the third round. Statements addressed primary and booster dosing (e.g., number and frequency) and other considerations such as vaccine type or heterologous messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccination. Following the Delphi Panel, an online survey was conducted to assess physician agreement within the disease areas (n = 50 each, n = 200 total) with the consensus statements.

resultsModerate to strong consensus was achieved for all primary series vaccination statements across disease groups, except one in hematology. Similarly, moderate to strong consensus was achieved for all booster series statements in all disease areas. However, statements on antibody titer measurements for re-vaccination considerations and higher dosages for immunocompromised patients did not reach agreement. Overall, approximately 62%-96% of physicians strongly agreed with the primary and booster vaccine recommendations. However, low agreement (29%-69%) was found among physicians for time interval between disease-specific treatment and vaccination, recommendations for mRNA vaccines, heterologous mRNA vaccination, antibody titer measurement and higher vaccine dosage for immunocompromised groups.

conclusionConsensus was achieved for disease-specific COVID-19 vaccine recommendations concerning primary and booster series vaccines and was generally well accepted by practicing physicians.

Indexed as

Coronavirus disease 2019COVID-19Hematologic malignancyImmunocompromisedRenal diseaseRheumatologic diseaseSARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2Solid organ transplantVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39387989
PMCPMC11499552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.