ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Apraxia phenotypes and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApraxia has been identified in all clinical forms of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The characteristics of apraxia symptoms and their underlying cognitive/motor basis are not fully understood. This study investigated apraxia in pathological subtypes of FTLD.
methodsThe study constituted a retrospective review of 115 pathologically confirmed cases of FTLD from a single cognitive neurology centre. Patients in whom apraxia had been documented as a notable clinical characteristic were identified. Apraxia features, demographic, cognitive, neurological, and imaging findings were recorded.
resultsEighteen patients were identified: 12 with FTLD-tau pathology (7 corticobasal degeneration (CBD), four Pick type and one progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)) and six with FTLD-TDP pathology, all type A and four linked to progranulin gene mutations. Apraxia as a dominant presenting feature was typically associated with tau pathologies, whereas it emerged in the context of aphasia in TDP pathology. Apraxia typically predominated in one body part (face or limb) in tau but not TDP pathology. Relatively preserved activities in daily life were associated with TDP. Apraxia of speech was associated with tau pathology. Pick-type pathology was linked to symmetrical atrophy and late development of limb rigidity.
conclusionApraxia in FTLD subtypes has variable characteristics. Apraxia associated with CBD pathology conformed to criteria for probable corticobasal syndrome (CBS), whereas apraxia with Pick-type pathology did not. Apraxia in patients with TDP-A pathology was interpreted as one manifestation of their generalised communication disorder. Apraxia in FTLD may have distinct cognitive and motor substrates that require prospective investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.